Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)MIT researchers say you're no safer from Covid indoors at 6 feet or 60 feet in new study challenging [View all]
https://www.cnbc.com/amp/2021/04/23/mit-researchers-say-youre-no-safer-from-covid-indoors-at-6-feet-or-60-feet-in-new-study.htmlThe risk of being exposed to Covid-19 indoors is as great at 60 feet as it is at 6 feet even when wearing a mask, according to a new study by Massachusetts Institute of Technology researchers who challenge social distancing guidelines adopted across the world.
MIT professors Martin Bazant, who teaches chemical engineering and applied mathematics, and John Bush, who teaches applied mathematics, developed a method of calculating exposure risk to Covid-19 in an indoor setting that factors in a variety of issues that could affect transmission, including the amount of time spent inside, air filtration and circulation, immunization, variant strains, mask use and even respiratory activity such as breathing, eating, speaking or singing.
Bazant and Bush question long-held Covid-19 guidelines from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and World Health Organization in a peer-reviewed study published earlier this week in Proceedings of the National Academy of Science of the United States of America.
"We argue there really isn't much of a benefit to the six-foot rule, especially when people are wearing masks," Bazant said. "It really has no physical basis because the air a person is breathing while wearing a mask tends to rise and comes down elsewhere in the room so you're more exposed to the average background than you are to a person at a distance."
More at link.
35 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
MIT researchers say you're no safer from Covid indoors at 6 feet or 60 feet in new study challenging [View all]
SheltieLover
Apr 2021
OP
actually both of those fields would be fairly well versed in how air flows which appears to be what
dsc
Apr 2021
#3
These people have more expertise on how fluids and droplets move than medical people
caraher
Apr 2021
#22
"Fauci is such an idiot, he should have used the Bazant & Bush risk calculator"
dalton99a
Apr 2021
#4
How about 6 feet versus 1 or 2 feet? Since that's the ACTUAL POINT of the 6ft rule
Hugh_Lebowski
Apr 2021
#8
Has anyone ever seen the aerosol results of a sneeze? Of had a person sneeze in an about
joetheman
Apr 2021
#9
If is was 60 feet spacing that was needed then wouldn't everyone be sick now?
SWBTATTReg
Apr 2021
#10
If it's a poor reading I expect the authors to raise hell and demand it's taken down
Hugh_Lebowski
Apr 2021
#16
I was glad to see the 6 ft indoors recommendation and hoped it would be okay, but I wasn't
brewens
Apr 2021
#19
I'd tend to trust epidemiologists and immunologists more than chemical engineers
harumph
Apr 2021
#24
concentration in the turbulent jet at a distance of 6 ft is 30 times higher
DontBelieveEastisEas
Apr 2021
#25
Distance should tend to dilute the airborne cloud; drying should make the particles less infectious
Klaralven
Apr 2021
#27