Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Sheepshank

(12,504 posts)

17. This statement: "I have waited for the rebuttal,

Reply to naaman fletcher (Original post)

Wed Jan 11, 2012, 02:56 PM

Jan 2012

...... but it is now clear that the administration does not contest the charge."

I stopped reading right there.

A rebuttal to every single question, dug up fantasy, loony article...really? If no rebuttal then a tacit agreement? WOW idiocy and illogical conslusion in a printed article and people are lapping it up.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

31 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Bill Black: More Proof of Obama Policy of Covering Up for Elite Financial Criminals [View all] naaman fletcher Jan 2012 OP

Well, hell, let's VOTE THE BASTARD OUT! pinboy3niner Jan 2012 #1

NOW YER TALKIN' DUUUUDE!!!!!! cliffordu Jan 2012 #2

HEY, 2 EFFS pinboy3niner Jan 2012 #3

'm good - cliffordu Jan 2012 #15

Sorry, naaman fletcher Jan 2012 #4

I forgive you pinboy3niner Jan 2012 #5

Well, gee, I hope you enjoy more GOP scorched earth policies when Skidmore Jan 2012 #6

really? DisgustipatedinCA Jan 2012 #21

It just seems to be the same 3 negatives OVER and OVER and OVER again. FarLeftFist Jan 2012 #23

you read the article? G_j Jan 2012 #7

BAWHAHAHA joshcryer Jan 2012 #9

Another simple-minded imbecile ... GeorgeGist Jan 2012 #10

black frylock Jan 2012 #16

+1 uponit7771 Jan 2012 #19

If it is true, it is serious. Vattel Jan 2012 #8

there are no "charges" - the Obama administration did not respond to a fucking news article banned from Kos Jan 2012 #12

William K. Black is no 'idiot' whose mind is full of 'conspiracy shit.' Octafish Jan 2012 #22

Thanks for the links. Do you know that its legal to prosecute someone in public? banned from Kos Jan 2012 #25

To clean up this huge corruption, would require the Fed and Treasury to be in a brawl against fasttense Jan 2012 #11

well, all I know newspeak Jan 2012 #14

du rec. nt xchrom Jan 2012 #13

This statement: "I have waited for the rebuttal, Sheepshank Jan 2012 #17

Thank you. People like Black need to take action in the court system banned from Kos Jan 2012 #18

You really live in some fantasy world... SomethingFishy Jan 2012 #27

WTF!?!? No Rebutal = affirmed alogations!?!??! uponit7771 Jan 2012 #20

William K. Black spoke with Bill Moyers a ways back... Octafish Jan 2012 #24

I read the article that predicated this column. LiberalAndProud Jan 2012 #26

Yeah - but the peanut gallery doesn't really care about a small time exec at IndyMac. banned from Kos Jan 2012 #28

I don't know who the peanut gallery are. LiberalAndProud Jan 2012 #29

Sounds like a personal vendetta/issue for someone treestar Jan 2012 #30

DU Rec. bvar22 Jan 2012 #31