Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

dawg day

(7,947 posts)
21. It doesn't have to be either/or.
Sat May 1, 2021, 05:37 PM
May 2021

Does it? We can consider things like moving traffic and "wellness checks" and mental health emergencies away from the police to those better able to deal with them without violence.

We can require better recruitment and training. We can restrict the use of weapons and military equipment (remember the TANKS in Kenosha? Huh?).

I'm not sure if anything will work, however, as long as there are more guns than citizens in the country.

In other countries, the police don't have to regard every person on the street as a potential killer, because none of those people are likely to have guns.
Most of us, of course, aren't walking around with guns, but the police seem to train for constant threat.

Some people already do and it's working out great. blm May 2021 #1
I was talking about Eugene in my post. Least police presence out of any state I have lived and LizBeth May 2021 #3
Oregon has to a large extent and works well in Eugene. We have Cahoots that handle mental and LizBeth May 2021 #2
I don't know of anyone who wants to abolish the police StarfishSaver May 2021 #4
I don't know these people personally sarisataka May 2021 #27
That was not what the original slogan meant, but as someone else pointed out: if you have to explain Hekate May 2021 #5
So as long as someone makes a bad faith argument gratuitous May 2021 #8
the problem wasn't really 'bad faith' argument stopdiggin May 2021 #11
It's not a bad faith argument Hawker123 May 2021 #12
No Klaralven May 2021 #6
no XanaDUer2 May 2021 #7
short answer is no stopdiggin May 2021 #9
Depends on what you mean by defund wryter2000 May 2021 #10
Nope, reform yes Hawker123 May 2021 #13
No.. Hold the Abusive Police Cha May 2021 #14
I'm a fan of taking away activities from police that other, non-violent prone agencies... brush May 2021 #15
Defund the police.... quickesst May 2021 #16
No. Perhaps the better question would be ... SWBTATTReg May 2021 #17
No. CentralMass May 2021 #18
I have no idea who would like to abolish their police force... stillcool May 2021 #19
Defund the police, was quite forcefully pushed into the dialogue and weaponised against Democratic. ShazamIam May 2021 #20
It doesn't have to be either/or. dawg day May 2021 #21
We need to train a new type of police officer. Mr.Bill May 2021 #22
I hear Mogadishu is nice this time of year. 11 Bravo May 2021 #23
No but have lived in a country with gunless police. LakeArenal May 2021 #24
If I were I criminal, I would. Evergreen Emerald May 2021 #25
I grew up in Roxbury, a part of Boston, the neighborhood was half White and half Black. marie999 May 2021 #26
My preference is to leave sarisataka May 2021 #28
If there were strong social services in place, absolutely yes! Withywindle May 2021 #29
There are many things that the police do which they shouldn't be doing dsc May 2021 #30
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Would you actually live i...»Reply #21