Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

JHB

(38,114 posts)
30. Taking a stab at it...
Thu May 13, 2021, 06:57 AM
May 2021

"GFOs" = general and flag officers. Generals and admirals, in non-militaryspeak.


Active duty:

As of November 1,2018, there were 891 active duty GFOs subject to statutory caps, which is 72 less than the maximum of 963 authorized by law.There were also another 29exempt from the statutory caps. The current number is about average for the post-Cold War era, though substantially lower than the number of GFOs in the 1960s-1980s,when the Armed Forceswere much larger in size than they are today. However, while always very small in comparison to the total force, the general and flag officer corps has increased as a percentage of the total forceover the past five decades. GFOs made up about one-twentieth of one percent (0.048%) of the total force in 1965, while they made up about one-fifteenth of one percent (0.069%) of the total force in 2018, indicating that the share of the total forcemade up of GFOs increased by 44%. Some argue that this increased proportion of GFOs is wasteful and contributes to more bureaucratic decisionmaking processes. Others counter that the increased proportion is linked to the military’s greater emphasis on joint and coalition operations, core organizational requirements, and the increasing use of advanced technologies.


Number of retirees is harder to pin down quickly, but the first guy on the list, a Coast Guard rear admiral, retired in 1991, 30 years ago. GHW Bush was president, the Soviet Union still had a month left in it, and FOX News didn't even exist yet.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

very disturbing indeed Skittles May 2021 #1
I bet most of them think that Putin is a swell guy too. TheBlackAdder May 2021 #21
Retired white privileged flynn types!! Who cares PortTack May 2021 #2
This is how military coups happen. zaj May 2021 #12
Oh gods no... Hekate May 2021 #3
They need to be examined to see how far they are down the Alzheimer's rabbit hole. dhol82 May 2021 #4
120 out of 1,000's is not a huge issue. Phoenix61 May 2021 #5
120 Generals have become radicalized nutjobs. zaj May 2021 #13
Micheal Flynn + 120 more. Phoenix61 May 2021 #18
It's f',ing bonkers and we have to say I'm that outloud zaj May 2021 #22
... on another planet, this is horrible on Earth to have former flag officers sold out to Trump uponit7771 May 2021 #23
Is this a reliable news source? everyonematters May 2021 #6
This message was self-deleted by its author JHB May 2021 #27
Joe Arbuckle and the 119 other voices in his head Takket May 2021 #7
My thoughts, too. Hugin May 2021 #32
Didn't something like this happen some time ago, House of Roberts May 2021 #8
How many were approached and didn't sign it? everyonematters May 2021 #9
The most notorious signer is GP6971 May 2021 #10
The crackpot legion weighs in gratuitous May 2021 #11
Business Insider is not a legitimate source. RegularJam May 2021 #14
Why aren't they legitimate? My impression of them has moonscape May 2021 #24
They have a history of printing false stories, have given sponsors direct editorial control, RegularJam May 2021 #26
The only thing I can find online about this group... RegularJam May 2021 #15
If you go to their websites "Media and PR Center" RegularJam May 2021 #16
It's unfortunate but 124 retired flag officers - many of whom have been retired "for decades" - TomSlick May 2021 #17
check their bank accounts CatWoman May 2021 #19
Just a tacky little question here. WTEF are we doing with all these retired generals and admirals? niyad May 2021 #20
Taking a stab at it... JHB May 2021 #30
Most informative, and I thank you. The song is still playing in my head. niyad May 2021 #33
Thanks. Wars also once required a lot more people in uniform. Hortensis May 2021 #38
Also, there's something of a conveyor belt at work JHB May 2021 #39
Thanks for the context. Only five years at a grade striven for for years Hortensis May 2021 #43
Why is anyone surprised that there are 120 retired Generals Locutusofborg May 2021 #25
This is like creationists trotting out some pet PhDs to "prove" evolution is "disputed". JHB May 2021 #28
The first name on that list, Coast Guard Rear Admiral Ernest B. Acklin... JHB May 2021 #29
From Politico: StarfishSaver May 2021 #31
Swiftboat 2021. n/t Passenger May 2021 #34
Very disturbing story. kentuck May 2021 #35
What retired generals have to say is of precious little importance. MineralMan May 2021 #36
These are retired, but it's crossed my mind to wonder if their sort may have been Hortensis May 2021 #37
Oafkeepers and Swiftboaters. haele May 2021 #40
It's a big warning alarm going off that Fox News, Trump + allies succeeded in "1984'ing" the US andym May 2021 #41
124 is actually an insignificant number. Elessar Zappa May 2021 #42
How do you determine what a significant number is to cause problems? andym May 2021 #44
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»More than 120 retired gen...»Reply #30