Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

If Trump was still in office it wouldn't matter cuz the christofascists have to have Israel Thomas Hurt May 2021 #1
There won't be any evidence. roamer65 May 2021 #2
No evidence of any rockets fired from that building. multigraincracker May 2021 #3
Huh. WhiskeyGrinder May 2021 #4
Gasp! Ya mean the Israelis lied? snark off abqtommy May 2021 #5
Totally off mark. What it means is that Israel provided the information and Blinken has not seen it. Beastly Boy May 2021 #6
I agree. It doesn't mean there is or isn't, it is just that he hasn't seen it. He is currently in JohnSJ May 2021 #8
Why wouldn't he have looked at it? It makes no sense, since he said he asked for evidence, pnwmom May 2021 #10
There is a million reasons why he wouldn't have, Beastly Boy May 2021 #13
He said he hasn't seen any evidence. pnwmom May 2021 #14
Agree 100% panader0 May 2021 #17
Obviously, at least according to the article, the SoS knows of the information being provided. Beastly Boy May 2021 #19
No, he said "IF" there is evidence he hasn't seen it. He didn't say there was evidence. n/t pnwmom May 2021 #27
He said he hasn't seen the evidence provided. Beastly Boy May 2021 #18
and -- there are real tangible reasons stopdiggin May 2021 #20
This message was self-deleted by its author Beastly Boy May 2021 #25
I am not guessing. I am reading the content that's in the article. Beastly Boy May 2021 #26
Why I'm Shocked, SHOCKED! WHITT May 2021 #7
A more accurate header would be:"Blinken has not seen evidence provided by Israel that Hamas was in Beastly Boy May 2021 #9
He doesn't indicate that Israel provided any evidence. If they had, the Secretary of State pnwmom May 2021 #11
How would you interpret "But he said that he personally has "not seen any information provided."? Beastly Boy May 2021 #15
That sentence is not as clear as you seem to think. pnwmom May 2021 #36
I do think it's very clear. Beastly Boy May 2021 #37
You're missing that tiny but significant word. pnwmom May 2021 #38
There is another very insignificant word. Beastly Boy May 2021 #40
The "and" is part of the clause that BEGINS with "if." "If" modifies the whole clause, including pnwmom May 2021 #42
You don't know that. former9thward May 2021 #35
What's the evidence that Israel provided any evidence? Mysterian May 2021 #12
You just read an AP report that states information was provided. Beastly Boy May 2021 #16
No, I didn't Mysterian May 2021 #21
"Information provided" doesn't mean information was provided? Beastly Boy May 2021 #28
"had 'not seen any information provided.'" Mysterian May 2021 #31
Ok, you tell me what the whole sentence means. Beastly Boy May 2021 #32
The word "if" is conditional and changes everything. nt pnwmom May 2021 #39
It doesn't say that. The lack of seen evidence isn't proof that evidence exists. pnwmom May 2021 #24
Ok, I think I see what you mean. Beastly Boy May 2021 #29
Closer, but not quite. pnwmom May 2021 #33
You seem to agree in one respect Beastly Boy May 2021 #34
latest in Yahoo News stopdiggin May 2021 #22
Meanwhile, Al Jazeera is still on air Netanyahu. roamer65 May 2021 #23
Why wouldn't they be on the air? tritsofme May 2021 #30
In my view... Xolodno May 2021 #41
K & R Duppers May 2021 #43
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Sec. of State Blinken has...»Reply #7