Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: The Washington Post has a pretty controversial article about Jimmy Carter up. [View all]WhiskeyGrinder
(27,075 posts)7. Find what out ahead of time?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
41 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
The Washington Post has a pretty controversial article about Jimmy Carter up. [View all]
BlueStater
May 2021
OP
Uhh, good journalism would be to find that out ahead of time before publishing such a piece.
W_HAMILTON
May 2021
#6
An official response to the article (e.g., from the Carters themselves or their spokesperson)
W_HAMILTON
May 2021
#16
The author requested a comment and didn't get one; that's not necessarily a reason to hold a story.
WhiskeyGrinder
May 2021
#17
I should think it would be obvious, especially to any DUer who has witnessed 40 years of
hlthe2b
May 2021
#10
I do not argue against questioning--just one-side accusations with no due diligence to find out WHY!
hlthe2b
May 2021
#12
But the reporter did try to find out why. She talked to a bunch of people involved.
WhiskeyGrinder
May 2021
#13
Look, I get it. It's no fun to find out that people you like did hurtful things.
WhiskeyGrinder
May 2021
#24
YOU may conclude that. I take this as implied wrong-doing with no opportunity to explain
hlthe2b
May 2021
#25
According to the article, part of the reason Carter approved it was because he was the one who
WhiskeyGrinder
May 2021
#20
I think Jimmy Carter's motives are clean. There's quite a few odd bits in that story, ...
marble falls
May 2021
#30
If you are paying 17 USD per month for basic NYT access, you are so overpaying
Celerity
May 2021
#37
Welcome to DU, but no, the WaPo and the NYT will continue to be (rightfully so) posted here, as they
Celerity
May 2021
#35
Dammit, I'm not going to be able to listen to Peter, Paul and Mary anymore.
Crunchy Frog
May 2021
#26
The thing to remember is that Yarrow and Nugent are independently creepy. Yarrow'd be creepy ...
marble falls
May 2021
#29
Here's an article on the Yarrow charges that does not have a paywall to deal with...
bullwinkle428
May 2021
#34