Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)
 

cali

(114,904 posts)
Tue Oct 16, 2012, 04:38 AM Oct 2012

If Roe v. Wade Goes (What happens next is the end of reproductive rights) [View all]

<snip>

The result would turn back the clock to the days before Roe v. Wade when abortion was legal only in some states, but not in others. There is every indication that about half the states would make abortion illegal within a year of Roe being struck down, according to the Guttmacher Institute. The Center for Reproductive Rights, which challenges abortion restrictions around the country, puts the number at 30 states. For one thing, abortion bans already on the books in some states would suddenly kick in. And some Republican-controlled state legislatures would outlaw abortion immediately.

Even with Roe and subsequent decisions upholding abortion rights, more than half the states have enacted barriers like mandatory waiting periods, “counseling” sessions lacking a real medical justification; parental consent or notification laws; and onerous clinic “safety” rules intended to drive clinics out of business.

Mr. Romney is a vocal supporter of this continuing drive in the states and in Congress to limit the constitutional right, even without overturning Roe. To a large degree, the anti-abortion forces have succeeded. In 1982, there were about 2,900 providers nationwide; as of 2008, there were less than 1,800. In 97 percent of the counties that are outside of metropolitan areas, there are no abortion providers at all.

We do not need to guess about the brutal consequences of overturning Roe. We know from our own country’s pre-Roe history and from the experience around the world. Women desperate to end a pregnancy would find a way to do so. Well-to-do women living in places where abortion is illegal would travel to other states where it is legal to obtain the procedure. Women lacking the resources would either be forced by the government and politicians to go through with an unwanted or risky pregnancy, attempt to self-abort or turn to an illegal — and potentially unsafe — provider for help. Women’s health, privacy and equality would suffer. Some women would die.

<snip>

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/10/16/opinion/if-roe-v-wade-goes.html?_r=0

30 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
It is not even just abortion, these assbites want to make contraception Live and Learn Oct 2012 #1
The GOP has already said women should stay with abusive spouses. Some states have given rapists freshwest Oct 2012 #2
hyperbole is counter productive and the real threats are dire enough cali Oct 2012 #3
Who would ever have thought that they would attempt to ban contraceptive Live and Learn Oct 2012 #4
Who would ever have thought they wouldn't attempt to ban contraceptives? cali Oct 2012 #21
If contraception has the remote possibility of preventing implantation HockeyMom Oct 2012 #23
This is not hyperbole, I think you must live in a very liberal area. If they do take down Roe, Egalitarian Thug Oct 2012 #7
well yes, I live in Vermont but that has nothing to do with my analysis cali Oct 2012 #10
If you really believe that, you need to get out into the rest of the country more. Egalitarian Thug Oct 2012 #15
Very true! nt Live and Learn Oct 2012 #16
Maybe not barrier methods of contraception, HockeyMom Oct 2012 #24
+1 nt Live and Learn Oct 2012 #5
I'm not sure about some of these assertions.... Swede Atlanta Oct 2012 #11
Here's a link: Ilsa Oct 2012 #14
You are being way too optimistic and lalalu Oct 2012 #28
The really scary part is that there are people lalalu Oct 2012 #26
And they took power in 2010 and now want the presidency. freshwest Oct 2012 #29
WWARD: What Would Ayn Rand Do? Major Nikon Oct 2012 #6
Ugh, I sure don't want to be reduced to touting Rand's philosophy Live and Learn Oct 2012 #8
It's more about hypocrisy than any of Rand's pseudo-philosophy Major Nikon Oct 2012 #9
Of course, I got that. But they won't. Live and Learn Oct 2012 #13
Once they find out Rand was a pro-choice atheist, they would want to burn her books instead Major Nikon Oct 2012 #18
Do you seriously think they would ever get that far in their studies? nt Live and Learn Oct 2012 #19
I never underestimate the stupidity of the average wingnut Major Nikon Oct 2012 #20
I agree that pointing anyone who mentions her to the Live and Learn Oct 2012 #22
And then mgardener Oct 2012 #12
Then they would overturn Supreme Court rulings agjainst sodemy laws. Mothdust Oct 2012 #17
Marv Albert trial HockeyMom Oct 2012 #25
Yes, i remember that. lalalu Oct 2012 #27
but the u.s. supreme court eventually struck down sodomy laws Mothdust Oct 2012 #30
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»If Roe v. Wade Goes (Wha...