Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Silent3

(15,909 posts)

2. What's really infuriating is that anyone would defend the practically-zero-effort filibuster

Reply to TheRickles (Original post)

Mon May 31, 2021, 10:37 AM

May 2021

There might be somewhat reasonable arguments for some form of filibuster, but even Manchin and Sinema should be able to see that the current form is absolutely insane.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

9 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Would 54-0 be enough to end a filibuster? [View all] TheRickles May 2021 OP

Nope USAFRetired_Liberal May 2021 #1

What's really infuriating is that anyone would defend the practically-zero-effort filibuster Silent3 May 2021 #2

That vote didn't signal who was willing to end the filibuster process StarfishSaver May 2021 #3

It's stupid rule. Should be just the opposite. honest.abe May 2021 #4

54 votes isn't enough to end a specific filibuster, but 51 votes IS enough to kill it forever Fiendish Thingy May 2021 #5

Funny Timewas May 2021 #7

K&R GoodRaisin May 2021 #8

The senate decided these situations at the beginning of each senate session jimfields33 May 2021 #6

Technically, if there was no Republican senator on the floor, they could invoke cloture by unanimous tritsofme May 2021 #9