General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: How is it legal? [View all]Buckeye_Democrat
(15,540 posts)... long after the election was over. It obviously had no bearing on the results, as was known when it started.
The recount by them was chock-full of irony for both the Gore and Bush teams, both of whom repeatedly pushed for things which wouldn't have helped them at all -- such as the limited recount in mostly Democratic counties by Gore, which would've still resulted in a Bush victory. A full recount of the entire state, on the other hand, would've resulted in Gore barely winning depending on how contested ballots were included/excluded.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/politics/2001/11/12/florida-recounts-would-have-favored-bush/964f109e-c871-4050-af25-f7978cc25dfa/
This Arizona recount is a partisan joke in comparison, but it won't change anything. The insane will continue believing whatever they want to believe, no matter what this supposed recount reveals either way.