Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

will read later, but markie Jun 2021 #1
Wonder how much capital gains tax was paid by the millions selling shares in Amazon? Lots, and with Hoyt Jun 2021 #2
Good reminder of why ProPublica is worth supporting. Pinback Jun 2021 #3
+1 ... thanks. KPN Jun 2021 #12
K & R Nevilledog Jun 2021 #4
973m in taxes on 4.2b in income fescuerescue Jun 2021 #17
Looks like they're using the Wealth Growth column as an indicator of True Tax Rate. Pinback Jun 2021 #25
OIC. fescuerescue Jun 2021 #26
It's a news article, not an "advertisement." BTW, Elizabeth Warren's proposal would have zero effect Pinback Jun 2021 #27
I'm happy to use the word advocate then. fescuerescue Jun 2021 #35
There is one dsc Jun 2021 #39
indeed fescuerescue Jun 2021 #42
going on for years , and they still keep screaming ,"my taxes are too high", AllaN01Bear Jun 2021 #5
Give it back. cbabe Jun 2021 #6
What do you mean by ''... give it back.''? ... aggiesal Jun 2021 #20
Give it back cbabe Jun 2021 #29
Understood, thanks. n/t aggiesal Jun 2021 #34
No mystery. We tax income, not wealth. thesquanderer Jun 2021 #7
No, this is specifically about INCOME tax SoonerPride Jun 2021 #8
I did read a lot of the article. It seems like maybe you didn't? thesquanderer Jun 2021 #15
Do you not believe they are leveraging this wealth and avoiding taxes? ... aggiesal Jun 2021 #24
True. But the fundamental issue remains that that's only possible BECAUSE... thesquanderer Jun 2021 #28
That is a big part of it - section headed Buy, Borrow, Die: How America's Ultrawealthy Stay That Way muriel_volestrangler Jun 2021 #38
We can all do this with our increased real estate equity ... aggiesal Jun 2021 #46
You're relying on house prices increasing, or at the least staying steady, with that strategy muriel_volestrangler Jun 2021 #48
So I'm going to respond to some statements made ... aggiesal Jun 2021 #49
No, you missed the point of the article. whopis01 Jun 2021 #19
This message was self-deleted by its author aggiesal Jun 2021 #22
This message was self-deleted by its author aggiesal Jun 2021 #23
The fact that they are able to do it is enough for me. BobTheSubgenius Jun 2021 #9
Love your user name btw SoonerPride Jun 2021 #10
SLACK, dude! BobTheSubgenius Jun 2021 #37
Warren's wealth tax would help for a while Warpy Jun 2021 #11
election audit's my ass - time for rich bitch's audit's ! monkeyman1 Jun 2021 #13
2652 pages in the tax code, time to start over bucolic_frolic Jun 2021 #14
Kind of surprised that he decided to start paying taxes again 2011. fescuerescue Jun 2021 #16
one way to fix this rdking647 Jun 2021 #18
Until they fear this. multigraincracker Jun 2021 #21
K & R bookmarking FakeNoose Jun 2021 #30
Question: who here demanded that President Obama and the Democratic Congress address this? brooklynite Jun 2021 #31
The GOP's sole mission is to keep these fuckers free from paying their fair share Blue Owl Jun 2021 #32
Income tax taxes income, not wealth. Kaleva Jun 2021 #33
And they paid almost no income tax SoonerPride Jun 2021 #44
+1000 smirkymonkey Jun 2021 #36
Doesn't fill me with confidence in the IRS Shrek Jun 2021 #40
I doubt seriously this resulted from an IRS hack. Pinback Jun 2021 #41
I wasn't referring to cybersecurity Shrek Jun 2021 #43
One of the ProPublica journalists was on with Chris Hayes Deminpenn Jun 2021 #45
There was some consternation this morning about the privacy of those billionaires being violated Goodheart Jun 2021 #47
Yes. We should be able to pierce of the privacy of anyone we don't like fescuerescue Jun 2021 #50
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Essential reading: Never-...»Reply #42