Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(15,124 posts)

5. There is "predication" for both of those individuals. I am not aware of any such predication

Fri Jun 11, 2021, 06:47 PM

Jun 2021

for either Schiff or Swalwell.

Is not the major problem with the seeking of the orders rather than the compliance with them?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

20 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Right now, federal grand juries are investigating the insurrection [View all] StarfishSaver Jun 2021 OP

TY for the reminder empedocles Jun 2021 #1

Aren't there right ways and wrong ways? Legal and illegal ways? soothsayer Jun 2021 #2

Me, too StarfishSaver Jun 2021 #3

Saying the subpoenas were legal is a half truth, is it not? gab13by13 Jun 2021 #8

Yes - the subpoenas were probably legal but improper and an abuse of power StarfishSaver Jun 2021 #13

Grand juries give prosecutors very wide berth StarfishSaver Jun 2021 #14

The grand jury subpoena was likely legal StarfishSaver Jun 2021 #16

Your point is made, but FoxNewsSucks Jun 2021 #4

Custodians don't get to decide whether to comply with grand jury subpoenas StarfishSaver Jun 2021 #6

The custodian of the records sought has no role in assessing "predication" StarfishSaver Jun 2021 #7

You said you are a lawyer. gab13by13 Jun 2021 #9

Atticus is right StarfishSaver Jun 2021 #17

I respect your opinion, gab13by13 Jun 2021 #19

You have more clearly asked what is bothering me. triron Jun 2021 #15

Yes and I have no problem if they let them know now, after the fact Bev54 Jun 2021 #20