General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Merrick Garland just annouced DOJ is going to war on voting rights [View all]MerryHolidays
(7,715 posts)Even the OP said in a subsequent post that the title could be read two ways, adding the context of the post makes a difference.
It's not a big deal, but someone could genuinely read the OP title, without more, and come away with a different impression than what was meant.
The easiest thing to do (which many of us do) is to fall on our sword and update our posts by revising the ambiguous language when a fellow DUer points it out. It is common on DU for fellow posters to point things out issues like this, and essentially most everyone (but clearly not everyone) simply amends the post to remove the ambiguity. Most of us understand that it makes for a more effective DU. It is really not a big deal.
Having a fight over something that even the OP admits is ambiguous is silly. To be "pellucidly clear", as some good folks on DU like to say, no one is trolling or attacking any Democrat.