Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Hekate

(100,133 posts)
10. My take is so different from many: first & foremost a license is a legal document...
Wed Jun 16, 2021, 11:24 PM
Jun 2021

…which means that sex-work had a legal basis. I’m not sure how this is a bad thing, on its face, especially when you consider what harsh and punitive measures have typically been taken against women and girls who worked as prostitutes where it is illegal — fines, prison, loss of children if any, beatings, rape — but seldom levied of their customers or their pimps.

Without doing a fair amount of research, I don’t know how the fee of $2.50 per quarter compares to 1899 licenses for other occupations, activities, and so forth — but it is a good place to start, isn’t it?

The other question I would ask is how long it would take for the typical lady of negotiable affection to earn $2.50 in 1899, given that the license covered 3 months, ie 1/4 of a year.

I am curious,
Hekate

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Nice! underpants Jun 2021 #1
$325 is like 1 hour for an escort ... pretty sure every sex worker in the US would happily shell Hugh_Lebowski Jun 2021 #2
$325 in 1899 is equivalent in purchasing power to about $10,540.77 today IcyPeas Jun 2021 #3
I don't think you're reading the OP correctly :) nt Hugh_Lebowski Jun 2021 #5
Beat me to it. Volaris Jun 2021 #17
How much does Joe Manchin get paid? RainCaster Jun 2021 #4
Arizona - Mark Lindsay - 1969 keithbvadu2 Jun 2021 #6
Nevada Brothel License today: $6,000 + brooklynite Jun 2021 #7
Arizona wasn't a state in 1899. roamer65 Jun 2021 #8
I would imagine Australia's route on prostitution would have something to do with Captain Zero Jun 2021 #15
LOL... roamer65 Jun 2021 #18
That picture of the woman, looks an awful lot like one I have seen of Josephine Earp, DemocraticPatriot Jun 2021 #9
The veiled woman is certainly gorgeous, whoever she was nt Hekate Jun 2021 #11
i believe you have a BINGO! orleans Jun 2021 #16
License from 1899. Josephine Earp born 1861 NotASurfer Jun 2021 #20
My take is so different from many: first & foremost a license is a legal document... Hekate Jun 2021 #10
I am also curious as to the prices of her (his) services. IcyPeas Jun 2021 #13
Expensive license Nexus2 Jun 2021 #12
Banning prostitution is one of the last few things left both political sides agree to ansible Jun 2021 #14
If $2.50 equates to $about $82, when was Two Bits a thing? TheBlackAdder Jun 2021 #19
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»A License for Prostitutio...»Reply #10