Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
7. Interesting hypothesis.
Wed Jan 11, 2012, 07:35 PM
Jan 2012

What terrible and frightful scenario is going on at this very moment that caused an unholy trinity of Republicans, Democrats and the President to literally trash the Constitution and 200 years of successful separation of military and civilian authority?

Somewhere, I suspect, there’s at least one American citizen already being held by U.S. military forces, whom they suspect of being involved in something so horrible that they have to keep him or her locked up while they try to unravel the mess that he or she is involved with. And… if the past is any teacher, that American probably worked for the U.S. military, some American contractor, or the CIA before becoming an enemy of the state. The president must have called key members of Congress into his office and told them the story, showed them horrifying pictures, and told them he needed the authority to do whatever it was he wanted to do or the world as we know it would end.

http://www.tikkun.org/tikkundaily/2012/01/05/theres-something-theyre-not-telling-us-president-signs-indefinite-detention-law/

Did someone in the military or CIA do something really treasonous? That could be the problem. I don't think Manning would be the suspect this law was written for. Could be someone else.

This is, of course, just a theory, but it is intriguing.

I can't imagine that OWS was the impetus for the writing of this law. OWS may be a pain in the neck to the authorities, but it is not an insurrection, not even approaching it. And the authorities know it. OWS is mostly well educated people with unfulfilled dreams and lots to lose, not violent revolutionaries.

The article suggests that there must be something else behind this.

Sounds like a conspiracy theory, but then those theories are not always wrong -- rarely true, but not always wrong.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Money is the simplest and most logical explanation. LonePirate Jan 2012 #1
Or, in THIS case, bvar22 Jan 2012 #21
Obama signing that law is beyond the pale. So what if he won't use it. roguevalley Jan 2012 #34
Power corrupts..... vi5 Jan 2012 #2
Lord Acton ProfessorGAC Jan 2012 #38
"This law is, if I may be not overly dramatic, treasonous." DJ13 Jan 2012 #3
Ergo, the appeal of Ron Paul to many people. closeupready Jan 2012 #23
Oh please--have you ever seen Ron Paul in his swimsuit? n/t QC Jan 2012 #40
Apparently none are troubled by such piffles indepat Jan 2012 #24
The Unitary Presidency (institutionalized under Cheney/Bush) is the norm... SteveW Jan 2012 #4
FEMA camps...we're all going to FEMA camps. Old and In the Way Jan 2012 #5
Couple that with the Liebermann/Dent Bill making its' way through Congress and it's game, set match. Uncle Joe Jan 2012 #6
And control of the internet. woo me with science Jan 2012 #13
Interesting hypothesis. JDPriestly Jan 2012 #7
Very Interesting BeFree Jan 2012 #9
"I can't imagine that OWS was the impetus for the writing of this law" bvar22 Jan 2012 #22
consider the mannings of the world who will not save us for this. thanks, obama. roguevalley Jan 2012 #35
That language was write by Republicans and Obama had it taken OUT before he signed it and Welibs Jan 2012 #8
The author addresses that in the comments section: CrispyQ Jan 2012 #10
The next republican president will Autumn Jan 2012 #11
A signing statement doesn't mean jack shit . . . markpkessinger Jan 2012 #12
Mr. Obama works for Wall Street... lib2DaBone Jan 2012 #14
K&R woo me with science Jan 2012 #15
They say you can't fight what's comin'. I'd like to at least know what's coming. Poll_Blind Jan 2012 #16
We'd better damned well fight it now, woo me with science Jan 2012 #17
This correct and it is bipartisan. There is no just cause or good defense of the practices TheKentuckian Jan 2012 #18
No just cause, but I worry about their thinking. woo me with science Jan 2012 #30
The drug war. Warren DeMontague Jan 2012 #19
More like keeping that plant illegal in order to put folks in prison. a simple pattern Jan 2012 #37
The unfulfilled dreams of psychopaths. K&R (nt) T S Justly Jan 2012 #20
Post removed Post removed Jan 2012 #25
I thank the op for posting really important issues. Do you not think bbgrunt Jan 2012 #27
Post removed Post removed Jan 2012 #29
Those at the federal level are setting examples and providing weaponry for others at the local level AnotherMcIntosh Jan 2012 #26
I would like to know Proud Liberal Dem Jan 2012 #28
Our UNIFORMED troops are out of Iraq. AnotherMcIntosh Jan 2012 #31
War, and money. And the money that can be made from war. nt Romulox Jan 2012 #32
Fear. dawg Jan 2012 #33
I don't even know where to begin with this load of crap. MineralMan Jan 2012 #36
You could try to refute the article .... if you can. Better Believe It Jan 2012 #39
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»What caused an unholy tri...»Reply #7