Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: USA needs nuclear to achieve net zero, says US Energy Secretary Granholm [View all]The giant subsidy to the gas/coal/wind/solar industry
You omitted MASSIVE nuclear subsidies.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
73 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
USA needs nuclear to achieve net zero, says US Energy Secretary Granholm [View all]
NNadir
Jun 2021
OP
Never mind the 70 million people who died from air pollution since Fukushima while...
NNadir
Jun 2021
#13
If I was big oil nuke energy would be the enemy. I would put good money on it they're behind ...
uponit7771
Jun 2021
#16
The short life span, the destruction of pristine wilderness, the entrenchment of dangerous...
NNadir
Jun 2021
#56
K&R, its 2021 forget curing cancer if we can't make nuclear safe. 40 years ago maybe things were
uponit7771
Jun 2021
#10
Safer doesn't have to be less volatile. They can be standardized, modular, smaller while giving out
uponit7771
Jun 2021
#12
Standardization to bring down price per GWH which is reason we don't have a higher portion of ...
uponit7771
Jun 2021
#34
The waste is now recyclable and nuke power is RELATIVELY carbon free. 40 years ago safety was
uponit7771
Jun 2021
#15
Neither of those are fact based, I think its "hype" to have mRNA vaccines but they work and cancer
uponit7771
Jun 2021
#25
Actually, the most expensive form of energy is dangerous fossil fuels, by orders of magnitude.
NNadir
Jun 2021
#20
Gen IV molten salt reactors should at the very least be a part of the discussion.
retread
Jun 2021
#24