Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

WHITT

(2,868 posts)
39. Oops
Tue Jun 29, 2021, 09:03 AM
Jun 2021
The giant subsidy to the gas/coal/wind/solar industry

You omitted MASSIVE nuclear subsidies.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Sorry, Jennifer. roamer65 Jun 2021 #1
I wonder if they'll understand weeks of temperatures over 100F. NNadir Jun 2021 #3
+1000! Nt USALiberal Jun 2021 #30
That's exactly right. BlueLucy Jun 2021 #41
Good! Music Man Jun 2021 #2
Never mind Chernobyl, Fukushima Dai'ichi and Three Mile Island, eh? roamer65 Jun 2021 #4
Go look up how many people died in each of those accidents. Music Man Jun 2021 #5
Never mind the 70 million people who died from air pollution since Fukushima while... NNadir Jun 2021 #13
If I was big oil nuke energy would be the enemy. I would put good money on it they're behind ... uponit7771 Jun 2021 #16
+1 Klaralven Jun 2021 #21
It's obvious you have done research on this! Nt USALiberal Jun 2021 #31
There is a huge problem with solar panels jmowreader Jul 2021 #73
I totally agree. GulfCoast66 Jun 2021 #6
I don't support wind and solar, but I'll take what I can. NNadir Jun 2021 #7
Why against wind and solar? Nt USALiberal Jun 2021 #32
The short life span, the destruction of pristine wilderness, the entrenchment of dangerous... NNadir Jun 2021 #56
I support all three. Happy Hoosier Jun 2021 #54
Modern designs like the "modular" reactor, are nothing like reactors of old. PSPS Jun 2021 #8
Nevertheless, the "old" reactors, built on 1950's through 1970's technology... NNadir Jun 2021 #9
K&R, its 2021 forget curing cancer if we can't make nuclear safe. 40 years ago maybe things were uponit7771 Jun 2021 #10
It is unrealistic to demand that they be "safer." NNadir Jun 2021 #11
Safer doesn't have to be less volatile. They can be standardized, modular, smaller while giving out uponit7771 Jun 2021 #12
I'm not sure that I agree with "standardization." NNadir Jun 2021 #18
Standardization to bring down price per GWH which is reason we don't have a higher portion of ... uponit7771 Jun 2021 #34
The capital cost of nuclear plants represent a gift to future generations. NNadir Jun 2021 #35
The capital cost of nuclear plants represent a gift to future generations. NNadir Jun 2021 #36
Except WHITT Jun 2021 #14
The waste is now recyclable and nuke power is RELATIVELY carbon free. 40 years ago safety was uponit7771 Jun 2021 #15
Nope WHITT Jun 2021 #17
IPCC disagrees ... Hugh_Lebowski Jun 2021 #19
But WHITT Jun 2021 #37
Full lifecycle it's the lowest there is ... Hugh_Lebowski Jun 2021 #45
They're Undercounting WHITT Jun 2021 #60
Says you ... Hugh_Lebowski Jun 2021 #63
I Just Laid It Out For You WHITT Jun 2021 #66
That's what I thought ... you have words but you don't have statistics Hugh_Lebowski Jun 2021 #68
You make it sound like the total amount of carbon put out as about the same. StevieM Jun 2021 #46
Lol, nice try!?nt USALiberal Jun 2021 #51
Jobs, Jobs, Jobs. DiamondShark Jun 2021 #58
Actually WHITT Jun 2021 #61
This message was self-deleted by its author DiamondShark Jul 2021 #72
Neither of those are fact based, I think its "hype" to have mRNA vaccines but they work and cancer uponit7771 Jun 2021 #25
You do realize, don't you that there are literally thousands of papers... NNadir Jun 2021 #28
Nuclear energy Elessar Zappa Jun 2021 #29
You are obviously uninformed on this! Nt USALiberal Jun 2021 #33
Actually, the most expensive form of energy is dangerous fossil fuels, by orders of magnitude. NNadir Jun 2021 #20
+1, "climate change is very, very, very expensive..." uponit7771 Jun 2021 #27
Oops WHITT Jun 2021 #39
Comparable to what? NNadir Jun 2021 #42
The Average Cost WHITT Jun 2021 #62
Where's your proof? Everyone supposed to just 'take your word'? nt Hugh_Lebowski Jun 2021 #65
Eh WHITT Jun 2021 #67
I always say, if one doesn't know what one is talking about, make stuff up. NNadir Jun 2021 #71
Nuclear cost John ONeill Jun 2021 #38
Let's get going with it then. K and R. oasis Jun 2021 #22
First we have to rebuild some steel mills that can forge the components Klaralven Jun 2021 #23
It wouldn't bother me if they were made in South Korea. hunter Jun 2021 #53
Gen IV molten salt reactors should at the very least be a part of the discussion. retread Jun 2021 #24
So glad she said it. Elessar Zappa Jun 2021 #26
We have been ten years away from a working fusion reactor edhopper Jun 2021 #40
The human race has worked itself into a corner... hunter Jun 2021 #43
Why, thank you... NNadir Jun 2021 #59
"Yes, but..." PETRUS Jun 2021 #44
The environmental superiority of nuclear energy is independent... NNadir Jun 2021 #47
I agree. harumph Jun 2021 #49
You have correctly touched on nuclear energy's most important drawback. NNadir Jun 2021 #57
Your ideas about the environmental superiority of nuclear power Ron Green Jun 2021 #50
Not a band-aid. More like first aid for a sucking chest wound. hunter Jun 2021 #70
Wouldn't replacing coal plants with nuclear plants be part of that "growth?" hunter Jun 2021 #52
Those are sensible thoughts and questions! PETRUS Jun 2021 #55
My uncle worked on some of the early Westinghouse reactors. harumph Jun 2021 #48
Agree. jeffreyi Jun 2021 #64
I highly recommend Bill Gates new book WarGamer Jun 2021 #69
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»USA needs nuclear to achi...»Reply #39