Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

lindysalsagal

(22,902 posts)
5. Technicality in strategy. DAMN!
Wed Jun 30, 2021, 12:53 PM
Jun 2021

Bill Cosby’s sex assault conviction will be overturned and the 83-year-old comedian will be released from prison after the Pennsylvania State Supreme Court issued an opinion to vacate his conviction Wednesday.

Pennsylvania’s highest court overturned the conviction after finding an agreement with a previous prosecutor prevented Cosby from being charged in the case.

Cosby has served more than two years of a three- to 10-year sentence at a state prison near Philadelphia. He had vowed to serve all 10 years rather than acknowledge any remorse over the 2004 encounter with accuser Andrea Constand.

Cosby, who was once beloved as “America’s Dad,” was convicted of drugging and molesting the Temple University employee at his suburban estate.

He was charged in late 2015, when a prosecutor armed with newly unsealed evidence — Cosby’s damaging deposition from her lawsuit — arrested him days before the 12-year statute of limitations expired.

The trial judge had allowed just one other accuser to testify at Cosby’s first trial, when the jury deadlocked. However, he then allowed five other accusers to testify at the retrial about their experiences with Cosby in the 1980s.

The Pennsylvania Supreme Court said that testimony tainted the trial, even though a lower appeals court had found it appropriate to show a signature pattern of drugging and molesting women.

Cosby was the first celebrity tried and convicted in the #MeToo era, so the reversal could make prosecutors wary of calling other accusers in similar cases. The law on prior bad act testimony varies by state, though, and the ruling only holds sway in Pennsylvania.

Prosecutors did not immediately say if they would appeal or seek to try Cosby for a third time.

The justices voiced concern not just about sex assault cases, but what they saw as the judiciary’s increasing tendency to allow testimony that crosses the line into character attacks. The law allows the testimony only in limited cases, including to show a crime pattern so specific it serves to identify the perpetrator.

In New York, the judge presiding over last year’s trial of movie mogul Harvey Weinstein, whose case had sparked the explosion of the #MeToo movement in 2017, let four other accusers testify. Weinstein was convicted and sentenced to 23 years in prison. He is now facing separate charges in California.

In Cosby’s case, one of his appellate lawyers said prosecutors put on vague evidence about the uncharged conduct, including Cosby’s own recollections in his deposition about giving women alcohol or quaaludes before sexual encounters.

“The presumption of innocence just didn’t exist for him,” Jennifer Bonjean, the lawyer, argued to the court in December.

In May, Cosby was denied paroled after refusing to participate in sex offender programs during his nearly three years in state prison. He has long said he would resist the treatment programs and refuse to acknowledge wrongdoing even if it means serving the full 10-year sentence.

This is the first year he was eligible for parole under the three- to 10-year sentence handed down after his 2018 conviction.

Cosby spokesperson Andrew Wyatt called the parole board decision “appalling.”

Prosecutors said Cosby repeatedly used his fame and “family man” persona to manipulate young women, holding himself out as a mentor before betraying them.

Cosby, a groundbreaking Black actor who grew up in public housing in Philadelphia, made a fortune estimated at $400 million during his 50 years in the entertainment industry. His trademark clean comedy and homespun wisdom fueled popular TV shows, books and standup acts.

He fell from favor in his later years as he lectured the Black community about family values, but was attempting a comeback when he was arrested.

“There was a built-in level of trust because of his status in the entertainment industry and because he held himself out as a public moralist,” Assistant District Attorney Adrienne Jappe, of suburban Montgomery County, argued to the justices.

Cosby had invited Constand to an estate he owns in Pennsylvania the night she said he drugged and sexually assaulted her.

Constand, a former professional basketball player who worked at his alma mater, went to police a year later. The other accusers knew Cosby through the entertainment industry and did not go to police.

The AP does not typically identify sexual assault victims without their permission, which Constand has granted.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I'm disgusted nt XanaDUer2 Jun 2021 #1
+1 nitpicker Jun 2021 #3
WTF? wryter2000 Jun 2021 #2
An agreement with a previous prosecutor that he wouldn't be charged is the reason. Drunken Irishman Jun 2021 #4
Why was this not raised during the original trial that he had an agreement with the madinmaryland Jun 2021 #19
It was raised. The trial judge Tomconroy Jun 2021 #21
It was Effete Snob Jun 2021 #27
Technicality in strategy. DAMN! lindysalsagal Jun 2021 #5
Wait... this says the PSC says Takket Jun 2021 #33
If The Reporting Is Accurate... ProfessorGAC Jun 2021 #6
I am wondering what the hell that previous prosecutor was trying to accomplish. lagomorph777 Jun 2021 #16
It allowed Constand to proceed with her civil claim against Cosby Effete Snob Jun 2021 #23
Thanks - that actually makes sense. lagomorph777 Jun 2021 #30
So, you would have decided the victim shouldn't get a civil judgment? Effete Snob Jun 2021 #26
I'd Need To See More Legal Opinions ProfessorGAC Jun 2021 #36
I don't understand your response Effete Snob Jun 2021 #38
Yes You Do ProfessorGAC Jun 2021 #40
Who did he bribe? greatauntoftriplets Jun 2021 #7
The prosecutor badly fouled up Sympthsical Jun 2021 #8
Typical incompetent Republican. Drunken Irishman Jun 2021 #9
This is everyone's shocked face n/t Sympthsical Jun 2021 #11
He not only got the time NJCher Jun 2021 #13
His wife compared his conviction to a lynching. She never left. NYC Liberal Jun 2021 #18
Nobody. Sounds like a previous prosecutor made a massive, massive mistake. bearsfootball516 Jun 2021 #10
A prosecutor who went on to become Trump's defense lawyer StarfishSaver Jun 2021 #12
The agreement was made Tomconroy Jun 2021 #22
Depends on your point of view fescuerescue Jun 2021 #28
well now that you look at it that way NJCher Jun 2021 #31
This is really the question of the day, isn't it? Dr. Strange Jun 2021 #35
Why? He had a case he could not win. former9thward Jun 2021 #37
Is it a tRump judge who made the ruling? MiniMe Jun 2021 #14
This was the PA Supreme Court Effete Snob Jun 2021 #24
There are surely other cases to move forward now though Johnny2X2X Jun 2021 #15
Another rapist walks... LizBeth Jun 2021 #17
This sucks. But at least he did some time, and the whole world knows he's guilty fishwax Jun 2021 #20
Massive screw-up. Ms. Toad Jun 2021 #25
Cosby already proclaiming it justice for black America n/m BradAllison Jun 2021 #29
Justice served $$$$$$$$$$ finally RANDYWILDMAN Jun 2021 #32
Great to be rich, isn't it? Takket Jun 2021 #34
Of course, once again, a Repuke is at the center of a perversion of justice. clementine613 Jun 2021 #39
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Court overturns Bill Cosb...»Reply #5