Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

left-of-center2012

(34,195 posts)
Tue Jul 13, 2021, 12:18 PM Jul 2021

Patient receives kidney meant for someone else, hospital says [View all]

CLEVELAND (AP) — An Ohio hospital has acknowledged that a patient received a new kidney meant for someone else. Officials at University Hospitals in Cleveland on Monday apologized for the mistake and said two employees have been placed on administrative leave. The kidney given to the wrong patient is compatible and the person is expected to recover, officials said.

The other patient’s surgery has been delayed. Officials said the hospital is reviewing how the error occurred to prevent similar mistakes going forward.

“We have offered our sincerest apologies to these patients and their families,” hospital spokesperson George Stamatis said in a statement. “We recognize they entrusted us with their care. The situation is entirely inconsistent with our commitment to helping patients return to health and live life to the fullest.”

The hospital has notified the United Network for Organ Sharing, which manages the national transplant system. A message seeking comment was left Tuesday with hospital officials.

https://www.pennlive.com/nation-world/2021/07/patient-receives-kidney-meant-for-someone-else-hospital-says.html

18 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Fortunately error was with a kidney. Had it been a heart or lungs, intended patient would likely hlthe2b Jul 2021 #1
Holy shit! I wonder how this happened. zuul Jul 2021 #2
surgeries as production lines Kali Jul 2021 #18
Article doesn't say whether the recipient actually NEEDED a kidney Bayard Jul 2021 #3
The worst part is... lame54 Jul 2021 #11
Something is fishy here Docreed2003 Jul 2021 #4
speaking as an engineer, *any* process, is subject to error (some more than others) unblock Jul 2021 #5
The old saying goes: "If you think you've designed a foolproof system... Wounded Bear Jul 2021 #6
yeah, this comes up with automation a lot. people just assume it eliminates errors unblock Jul 2021 #7
I worked mainly in hardware, but similar problems exist... Wounded Bear Jul 2021 #8
That's kinda what I think smells fishy Docreed2003 Jul 2021 #9
they might have been leaning on the rarity of the match to cover a weak priority check unblock Jul 2021 #10
Or fraud... lame54 Jul 2021 #12
certainly possible, though of course a good process should reduce the likelihood of that as well. unblock Jul 2021 #13
Of course it should - fraud is difficult to pull off... lame54 Jul 2021 #15
see post #10. the odds are long, but we don't know out of how many times. unblock Jul 2021 #17
Why do I feel that the person with the kidney is wealthy? Just my gut feeling... ZonkerHarris Jul 2021 #14
I have to say, it doesn't surprise me. Ms. Toad Jul 2021 #16
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Patient receives kidney m...