Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: So is it the Administration's stance that they thought Benghazi was a terrorist attack from day 2? [View all]underpants
(194,562 posts)41. This is a RW cottage industry at this point
they have convinced themselves of it
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
134 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
So is it the Administration's stance that they thought Benghazi was a terrorist attack from day 2? [View all]
dkf
Oct 2012
OP
The Administrations stance is that they care about finding out the facts and not spinning the issue.
ellisonz
Oct 2012
#2
As I recall, from the first, it was thought that a riot may have served as cover...
Barack_America
Oct 2012
#8
She's been posting on this topic since it occurred, do you think it's credible she doesn't know?
CreekDog
Oct 2012
#81
The only stance I care about is uncovering the truth in transparent manner and keeping us informed
JaneyVee
Oct 2012
#10
And stevenleser posted the video of the Rose Garden statement in his OP here:
pinboy3niner
Oct 2012
#20
What's your issue here? Were you looking for an immediate knee-jerk reaction by the President? nt.
OldDem2012
Oct 2012
#50
it was not just the adm. the pres of libya said it. it was on the news. word started coming out
seabeyond
Oct 2012
#78
So you do support the notion that the Administration has been telling us from day 2 that there was
dkf
Oct 2012
#26
Are you that daft and arguing with a transcript, and a video record of the event?
nadinbrzezinski
Oct 2012
#28
"Within 30 seconds of the attack, the President was not screaming, "Terror! Terror!" publicly.
mikeytherat
Oct 2012
#39
Me either. It was an act of terror, they waited for accurate info to come in.
uppityperson
Oct 2012
#88
They didn't know how much planning went into it, but of course they thought it was terrorism!
reformist2
Oct 2012
#49
Au contraire, mon ami! It is clear the posts come from the "ACME Post Supply"! Beep-beep!
WinkyDink
Oct 2012
#61
Even if it was a peaceful protest, those who chose to break from it and kill were terrorizing people
Tigress DEM
Oct 2012
#58
It is more than a decade after the 9-11 attacks....did the Bushies ever explain how
Bluenorthwest
Oct 2012
#70
The GOP called the Oklahoma City bombing an Islamic terrorist attack on day one.
ieoeja
Oct 2012
#71
It's offensive to try and spin this when we have four dead Americans including an Ambassador.
Hutzpa
Oct 2012
#89
The government's position, from day 2 onward, was that it was a coordinated attack
Azathoth
Oct 2012
#126