Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

WHITT

(2,868 posts)
10. I Notice
Sun Jul 18, 2021, 01:47 AM
Jul 2021

Last edited Sun Jul 18, 2021, 08:30 AM - Edit history (1)

you didn't address why all the dissenters made the argument in regards to the matter.

On Edit:

Why would the majority address it?

If, for example, the majority was already aware there were not enough votes to grant certiorari for the matter, what would be the point or need to address their dissent?

The Dissenters @ SCOTUS WHITT Jul 2021 #1
No they didn't FBaggins Jul 2021 #2
Yes They Did WHITT Jul 2021 #3
Sorry. That's flat untrue. The argument didn't lose FBaggins Jul 2021 #4
See Below WHITT Jul 2021 #6
Check The Documents WHITT Jul 2021 #5
Why not check the actual documents? FBaggins Jul 2021 #7
Which Is Why The Dissenters WHITT Jul 2021 #8
You can't claim that the "majority didn't buy it" FBaggins Jul 2021 #9
I Notice WHITT Jul 2021 #10
Answer #1 - Lack of judicial restraint/modesty FBaggins Jul 2021 #13
Non Sequitur WHITT Jul 2021 #16
You obviously just have a compulsion to reply even if you have no reply FBaggins Jul 2021 #20
Answer #2 - It's the part you aren't noticing that's important FBaggins Jul 2021 #14
Non Sequitur WHITT Jul 2021 #17
I Notice FBaggins Jul 2021 #18
BTW WHITT Jul 2021 #15
The condescension is entirely in your imagination FBaggins Jul 2021 #19
A lot of arguing here, but BGBD Jul 2021 #11
Good Luck WHITT Jul 2021 #12
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Obama calls on Congress t...»Reply #10