Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: So is it the Administration's stance that they thought Benghazi was a terrorist attack from day 2? [View all]OldDem2012
(3,526 posts)55. Just curious, but how did you manage....
...to say under cover for more than 29,000 posts? Will you receive an award for this back at your HQ?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
134 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
So is it the Administration's stance that they thought Benghazi was a terrorist attack from day 2? [View all]
dkf
Oct 2012
OP
The Administrations stance is that they care about finding out the facts and not spinning the issue.
ellisonz
Oct 2012
#2
As I recall, from the first, it was thought that a riot may have served as cover...
Barack_America
Oct 2012
#8
She's been posting on this topic since it occurred, do you think it's credible she doesn't know?
CreekDog
Oct 2012
#81
The only stance I care about is uncovering the truth in transparent manner and keeping us informed
JaneyVee
Oct 2012
#10
And stevenleser posted the video of the Rose Garden statement in his OP here:
pinboy3niner
Oct 2012
#20
What's your issue here? Were you looking for an immediate knee-jerk reaction by the President? nt.
OldDem2012
Oct 2012
#50
it was not just the adm. the pres of libya said it. it was on the news. word started coming out
seabeyond
Oct 2012
#78
So you do support the notion that the Administration has been telling us from day 2 that there was
dkf
Oct 2012
#26
Are you that daft and arguing with a transcript, and a video record of the event?
nadinbrzezinski
Oct 2012
#28
"Within 30 seconds of the attack, the President was not screaming, "Terror! Terror!" publicly.
mikeytherat
Oct 2012
#39
Me either. It was an act of terror, they waited for accurate info to come in.
uppityperson
Oct 2012
#88
They didn't know how much planning went into it, but of course they thought it was terrorism!
reformist2
Oct 2012
#49
Au contraire, mon ami! It is clear the posts come from the "ACME Post Supply"! Beep-beep!
WinkyDink
Oct 2012
#61
Even if it was a peaceful protest, those who chose to break from it and kill were terrorizing people
Tigress DEM
Oct 2012
#58
It is more than a decade after the 9-11 attacks....did the Bushies ever explain how
Bluenorthwest
Oct 2012
#70
The GOP called the Oklahoma City bombing an Islamic terrorist attack on day one.
ieoeja
Oct 2012
#71
It's offensive to try and spin this when we have four dead Americans including an Ambassador.
Hutzpa
Oct 2012
#89
The government's position, from day 2 onward, was that it was a coordinated attack
Azathoth
Oct 2012
#126