Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Lying by Omission about Break-Thru Covid-19 Infections? [View all]bluewater
(5,420 posts)94. "They are using the most current data they can - that's the point" No, they are not.
And that's the point om my OP post. The two news sources I cited in my OP post, AXIOS and NBC News, were citing statistics based on data that is months and months old.
Consider this from the OP:
Axios: Less than 0.1% of vaccinated Americans have been infected with COVID-19 and only 0.004% have been hospitalized.
That might be true, but it is misleading and does not give people an accurate view of the current risks.
Contrast that 0.004% hospitalization statistic with the recent statement made by Dr Fauci that hospialization rates for vaccinated people are actually much higher, around 4%. Here is one of the excellent posts a responder has made in this thread discussing this apparent contradiction:
Celerity (20,368 posts)
76. The only truly reliable data for ALL breakthrough infections of any sort in a group are the vax
long terms studies and trials. The best vax against Delta (Pfizer) data is showing that out of 100 fully vaxxed people, 20 or will have breakthrough infections, 12 of those 20 will be symptomatic, and 4 of those 20 will end up having to be hospitalised to some level.
Obviously there are studies (the infamous Israeli one for a perfect example) that show much lower effective rates (and also a decrease in effectiveness as time flows by) but I am going to focus on the highest, best results out there to avoid any perceived Cassandra-like behaviour emanating from my posts.
It is just ludicrous to say that out of 1,300 fully vaxxed people, ONE will have a breakthrough infection of any sort, yet here we are, with multiple posters on here claiming this utter bollocks.
NO vaccine firm has ever remotely claimed 99.9+% efficacy against infection. The highest of any widely available vax was 95% clinical trial efficacy (and 90% real world effectiveness) with Pfizer against the origin strain.
https://www.nbcboston.com/news/local/delta-variant-what-we-know-about-the-efficacy-of-covid-vaccines/2427527/
Another study, cited by Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, suggests that
the Pfizer vaccine is approximately
80% effective against preventing infection from Delta
88% effective at preventing symptomatic disease and
96% effective at preventing hospitalizations caused by the virus
https://www.aarp.org/health/conditions-treatments/info-2021/delta-coronavirus-variant.html
76. The only truly reliable data for ALL breakthrough infections of any sort in a group are the vax
long terms studies and trials. The best vax against Delta (Pfizer) data is showing that out of 100 fully vaxxed people, 20 or will have breakthrough infections, 12 of those 20 will be symptomatic, and 4 of those 20 will end up having to be hospitalised to some level.
Obviously there are studies (the infamous Israeli one for a perfect example) that show much lower effective rates (and also a decrease in effectiveness as time flows by) but I am going to focus on the highest, best results out there to avoid any perceived Cassandra-like behaviour emanating from my posts.
It is just ludicrous to say that out of 1,300 fully vaxxed people, ONE will have a breakthrough infection of any sort, yet here we are, with multiple posters on here claiming this utter bollocks.
NO vaccine firm has ever remotely claimed 99.9+% efficacy against infection. The highest of any widely available vax was 95% clinical trial efficacy (and 90% real world effectiveness) with Pfizer against the origin strain.
https://www.nbcboston.com/news/local/delta-variant-what-we-know-about-the-efficacy-of-covid-vaccines/2427527/
Another study, cited by Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, suggests that
the Pfizer vaccine is approximately
80% effective against preventing infection from Delta
88% effective at preventing symptomatic disease and
96% effective at preventing hospitalizations caused by the virus
https://www.aarp.org/health/conditions-treatments/info-2021/delta-coronavirus-variant.html
In closing, first let me say thanks for the discussion, but allow me to reply to one of your last comments:
If you think they should stop reporting at all because they don't have the statistics you want, then you'd deprive others of news they'd want.
Well, what I want is right now is for respected mainstream news sources, like Axios and NBC News, to stop reporting misleading statistics based on outdated data and report instead the current statistics that people like Dr Fauci are providing us. They are, after all _news_ sources, they have an obligation to stay as current as possible.
Thanks for a thoughtful discussion.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
132 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Exactly. I find the OP as offensive/seemingly willfully clueless as the accusations from other side
hlthe2b
Aug 2021
#5
I'm not even sure what you're saying. They're not lying. The vaccine is highly effective.
Dream Girl
Aug 2021
#4
Then why are they quoting statistics using months old data? No need to get personal.
bluewater
Aug 2021
#16
Who is "they"? Some random person on Twitter? The Tweet is not official just some random
Dream Girl
Aug 2021
#31
Yet you titled your post to imply CDC was "lying by omission." NO, you simply need to be able
hlthe2b
Aug 2021
#50
Your disingenous explanation without accepting responsibillity & editing your OP to clarify
hlthe2b
Aug 2021
#54
No. I am attacking your posts and questioning your motivation in not correcting erroneous
hlthe2b
Aug 2021
#59
And more have seen your baseless attacks on CDC that only helps the RW destroy confidence in
hlthe2b
Aug 2021
#62
If those numbers were 10 times worse than the vaccine was still be great and working as planned
uponit7771
Aug 2021
#10
You do understand that any one can post anything on social media. I could post year old data
Dream Girl
Aug 2021
#33
these insanely high claims for effectiveness against infection are bullshit, pure and simple
Celerity
Aug 2021
#14
It is VERY simple math, the 95% for Pfizer efficacy and 90% effectiveness numbers against infection
Celerity
Aug 2021
#27
It doesn't seem to be helping, I see a lot of doubling down and some ridiculing of other
Celerity
Aug 2021
#38
The ironic AF thing is that some of this is coming from people who are hardcore about masks!
bluewater
Aug 2021
#43
Also, over in the UK (I live in Sweden but I am London-raised) they had a very different outcome
Celerity
Aug 2021
#44
I do not see any good purpose for wilful and vast over-inflation of COVID-prevention numbers.
Celerity
Aug 2021
#47
We don't do ourselves any favors by overestimating the effectiveness of the vaccines.
dawg
Aug 2021
#25
"It's distressing that there are so many here that willfully focus on the negative..."
bluewater
Aug 2021
#84
"If a state had a 100% vaccination rate, what percent of new cases would be breakthrough?"
bluewater
Aug 2021
#102
I think it equally dishonest when people say even if you are vaccinated you are at any real risk
GulfCoast66
Aug 2021
#39
No, it's not lying, either "on purpose" or by accident. The data is incomplete
muriel_volestrangler
Aug 2021
#48
"What we really need is a figure for total breakthrough infections from some time in June."
bluewater
Aug 2021
#51
"They are using the most current data they can - that's the point" No, they are not.
bluewater
Aug 2021
#94
I think you are personally assuming something that no one else does, and which is unrealistic
muriel_volestrangler
Aug 2021
#97
You're assuming that 100% people will get infected in the absence of a vaccine.
muriel_volestrangler
Aug 2021
#116
Here's a nice article stating how much more contagious the delta variant is:
bluewater
Aug 2021
#119
The problem is that you are demanding that people only talk about what you want to hear
muriel_volestrangler
Aug 2021
#125
Again, you're blaming an article for not stating what you wanted it to state
muriel_volestrangler
Aug 2021
#128
The only truly reliable data for ALL breakthrough infections of any sort in a group are the vax
Celerity
Aug 2021
#76
yes, I bookmarked this thread as I have posted a fair amount of hard data in it
Celerity
Aug 2021
#81
Have to agree with all that. I'm just trying to figure out how to get through the next month.
Tomconroy
Aug 2021
#104
No, that is wrong. Sorry. You are now delving into utter randomness as you are not taking into
Celerity
Aug 2021
#111
The vax trial we are in used both lab-grown and then later on, wild strain variants
Celerity
Aug 2021
#115