Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

underpants

(196,294 posts)
13. I have tried to track this but if you go back a few years it was "95% of taxes"
Thu Oct 18, 2012, 07:29 AM
Oct 2012

the % that they pay has slowly gone down in rhetoric mostly because of tax breaks they continue to get

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Here's an article for you. Skidmore Oct 2012 #1
Historically, higher taxes on the rich have correlated to higher growth. Ichingcarpenter Oct 2012 #2
It's actually not counterintuitive n2doc Oct 2012 #32
Exactly! And small business men/women... WhaTHellsgoingonhere Oct 2012 #37
They own about 70% safeinOhio Oct 2012 #3
Thought the percentage was closer to 85% Doremus Oct 2012 #63
more or less true re income taxes but not "all" taxes. HiPointDem Oct 2012 #4
The top 10% is a misleading metric BainsBane Oct 2012 #5
They have over 90% of the wealth B Calm Oct 2012 #6
The top 20% hold 87.7% of the wealth. renie408 Oct 2012 #15
As a result the top 20% should pay 87.7% in taxes IMHO NotThisTime Oct 2012 #45
At the very least Generic Brad Oct 2012 #55
IMO that suggests they're getting paid too much CJCRANE Oct 2012 #7
Bingo! nt Xipe Totec Oct 2012 #9
Sounds just horrible and unfair King_Klonopin Oct 2012 #8
My way of thinking on this anymore BootinUp Oct 2012 #10
Actual data econoclast Oct 2012 #11
nicely done hfojvt Oct 2012 #52
The top 10% get 90% of the money lunatica Oct 2012 #12
I have tried to track this but if you go back a few years it was "95% of taxes" underpants Oct 2012 #13
Actually just the reverse econoclast Oct 2012 #17
The latest figures there are 2007... Spider Jerusalem Oct 2012 #42
Yes and no. It's only true if we're talking exclusively the federal income tax rates. Selatius Oct 2012 #14
People on Social Security paid into the system, aren't "taken care of" by the Top 10% at all. reformist2 Oct 2012 #16
Most get back more than paid in econoclast Oct 2012 #18
But that's to be expected, given typical returns on investments along with inflation. reformist2 Oct 2012 #22
Guess what? That would include THE TOP 10% ESPECIALLY. WinkyDink Oct 2012 #28
if you look at their figures, it's low-earners who get more than they pay in. HiPointDem Oct 2012 #62
"If you look at" the system, you'll see that low-earners get taxed on all their income, whereas THE WinkyDink Oct 2012 #65
I understand the system just fine, thanks. The fact of the cap has nothing to do with how much HiPointDem Oct 2012 #67
None of that is paid from income tax revenue. Warren Stupidity Oct 2012 #30
it clearly says that for those who retire starting in 2010, median or higher earners will HiPointDem Oct 2012 #61
If you handle your own retirement like the repukes want us to Doremus Oct 2012 #68
The 47% pay taxes. Many are retirees who paid into SS and are now receiving Warren Stupidity Oct 2012 #19
I think it's pretty close to that. sharkman25 Oct 2012 #20
If this is true... RichGirl Oct 2012 #21
The Top 10% benefit from the fact that consumers overpay for products. reformist2 Oct 2012 #23
From the CBO: sharkman25 Oct 2012 #24
You know, WTH would it matter? All it would show is that IT STILL ISN'T ENOUGH. The gap is HISTORIC. WinkyDink Oct 2012 #25
The bottom 60 percent have about 4.2 percent of the wealth ProSense Oct 2012 #26
So the top 10% have 73.1% of the money and pay 70% of the taxes. n/t ieoeja Oct 2012 #40
This is the answer! Hamlette Oct 2012 #44
The top 20% have almost 90% of the wealth gollygee Oct 2012 #27
If I was paid 100% of the income, I'd pay 100% of the taxes. Start from there with your response. stevenleser Oct 2012 #29
Study the link that econoclast gave in #17 Travelman Oct 2012 #31
It's because of the concentration of wealth louis c Oct 2012 #33
Thanks to all. Shanti Mama Oct 2012 #34
Info overload in a very good way. Shanti Mama Oct 2012 #35
Tell her that the 47% include older people on SS, the military, the disabled, and poor children. Dawgs Oct 2012 #36
And that she'd better hope she never gets a brain injury. WinkyDink Oct 2012 #38
In 2007 the top 5% had 37% of AGI and paid 60% of all income tax revenue. hack89 Oct 2012 #39
It is their responsibiltiy to give YOU proof, not that you hassle us for it. slampoet Oct 2012 #41
The truth is that its pretty balanced overall: bhikkhu Oct 2012 #43
Tell her how well this lie nadinbrzezinski Oct 2012 #46
Yeah, well, 93 percent of all financial wealth is controlled by the top 10 percent of the country. Lex Oct 2012 #47
The 1% has hoarded all the wealth so no wonder - TBF Oct 2012 #48
It's like feudal times where the Queen and the Lords owned the country's wealth Lex Oct 2012 #50
It's true that this kind of analysis should be part of the discussion. Kablooie Oct 2012 #49
I'd tell her PD Turk Oct 2012 #51
IF THEY PAID SOME FUCKING DECENT ASS WAGES THEY WOULD NOT HAVE TO TAKE CARE OF ANYONE !!!!! SmileyRose Oct 2012 #53
To all who helped me with this... Shanti Mama Oct 2012 #54
This is all academic horseshit anyway jmowreader Oct 2012 #56
Except for those like mitt who keep their money Cha Oct 2012 #57
I think tax rates should be based on wealth and income. aandegoons Oct 2012 #58
Everyone is stating evidence to the contrary durablend Oct 2012 #59
No. The 47% are paying a higher percentage of their income mmonk Oct 2012 #60
RW friend is an idiot. spanone Oct 2012 #64
Maybe so, but the statement is somewhat true. underoath Oct 2012 #71
Your friend is RW? And you think she knows "facts"? There's your difficulty, right there. WinkyDink Oct 2012 #66
Also remind your friend that most of the 47% magical thyme Oct 2012 #69
Pretty much true. underoath Oct 2012 #70
What is her point? That the 47% should be allowed to starve in the streets? yardwork Oct 2012 #72
It's a fairly simple myth to disprove. 99Forever Oct 2012 #73
So how did your discussion go after this? n/t jtuck004 Oct 2012 #74
In terms of raw dollars, it is close to true hootinholler Oct 2012 #75
Lies, Damn Lies, and Statistics... Blue Idaho Oct 2012 #76
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»RW friend says "Top ...»Reply #13