Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)Apple Inc. pays its CEO more, and those at the bottom less, than any other US company. [View all]
On the one hand, according to an AP story dated January 10, 2012,
Tim Cook could well end up being the highest-paid chief executive in the U.S. in 2011 after Apple Inc. granted him 1 million restricted stock units in August for taking the reins shortly before co-founder Steve Jobs died.
An Associated Press review of a securities filing shows that Cook's pay package was valued at $378 million.
Read more:
http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-cook-pay-20120110,0,5116180.story
On the other hand, according to Sue Halpern's review of Walter Isaacson's book Steve Jobs (in The New York Review of Books), Apple's products
come from places that do not make us better people for owning them, the factories in China where more than a dozen young workers have committed suicide, some by jumping; where workers must now sign a pledge stating that they will not try to kill themselves but if they do, their families will not seek damages; where three people died and fifteen were injured when dust exploded; where 137 people exposed to a toxic chemical suffered nerve damage; where Apple offers injured workers no recompense; where workers, some as young as thirteen, according to an article in The New York Times, typically put in seventy-two-hour weeks, sometimes more, with minimal compensation, few breaks, and little food, to satisfy the overwhelming demand generated by the theatrics, the marketing, the packaging, the consummate engineering, and the herd instinct; and where, it goes without saying, the people who make all this cannot afford to buy it?
While it may be convenient to suppose that Apple is no different than any other company doing business in Chinawhich is as fine a textbook example of a logical fallacy as there isin reality, it is worse. According to a study reported by Bloomberg News last January, Apple ranked at the very bottom of twenty-nine global tech firms in terms of responsiveness and transparency to health and environmental concerns in China.
Read more:
http://www.nybooks.com/articles/archives/2012/jan/12/who-was-steve-jobs/?pagination=false
42 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Apple Inc. pays its CEO more, and those at the bottom less, than any other US company. [View all]
Lionel Mandrake
Jan 2012
OP
Hmmm. I was sort of making this point elsewhere on the board earlier this evening.
MADem
Jan 2012
#2
It IS Apple's fault... they have quite a lot of control over who they do business with...
JCMach1
Jan 2012
#11
And Apple's contract with Foxconn requires better conditions than the rest of the plant
jeff47
Jan 2012
#23
The complaint is poor working conditions. Apple requires better working conditions
jeff47
Jan 2012
#29
Why doesn't Apple just move production to someplace that meets their requirements? nt
Snake Alchemist
Jan 2012
#32
Because Foxconn runs the Apple part of the factory such that it meets their requirements
jeff47
Jan 2012
#33
So you can abuse the hell out of workers if you're not making a large enough profit? (nt)
jeff47
Jan 2012
#36
Apple has the power to change that the same way Walmart has incredible power over its suppliers
JCMach1
Jan 2012
#39
I never understand people who have a favorite mega-corporation be it Apple or another. nt.
Snake Alchemist
Jan 2012
#12
I disliked Apple most of my adult life after I could not get support for an Apple 2C
LiberalArkie
Jan 2012
#13
It's only recently that Microsoft and the hardware people have been able to be so stable
jeff47
Jan 2012
#30
Why should Apple consumers waste their beautiful minds on irrelevant details like that?
eShirl
Jan 2012
#16