Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: "Osama bin Laden will never walk on this earth again" is the rhetoric we want to represent us? [View all]JackRiddler
(24,979 posts)48. The case against Libya for the Lockerbie bombing is dubious.
Mr. Boffin, obviously your intervention here is not an answer to what I wrote.
Nevertheless, to reply:
The Scotsman
http://www.scotsman.com/news/scottish-news/edinburgh-east-fife/police_chief_lockerbie_evidence_was_faked_1_1403341
Police chief- Lockerbie evidence was faked
Published on Sunday 28 August 2005 00:14
A FORMER Scottish police chief has given lawyers a signed statement claiming that key evidence in the Lockerbie bombing trial was fabricated.
The retired officer - of assistant chief constable rank or higher - has testified that the CIA planted the tiny fragment of circuit board crucial in convicting a Libyan for the 1989 mass murder of 270 people.
The police chief, whose identity has not yet been revealed, gave the statement to lawyers representing Abdelbaset Ali Mohmed Al Megrahi, currently serving a life sentence in Greenock Prison.
The evidence will form a crucial part of Megrahi's attempt to have a retrial ordered by the Scottish Criminal Cases Review Commission (SCCRC). The claims pose a potentially devastating threat to the reputation of the entire Scottish legal system.
SNIP
By 2009, the one man convicted for the Lockerbie bombing, Megrahi, was released by the UK on humanitarian grounds while his appeal, which looked set to overturn his conviction, was still in process.
You're not unfamiliar with the fact that even in the unlikely case that Megrahi had anything to do with the 1989 bombing of the Pan Am flight, the CIA still apparently saw a need to frame him by manufacturing the key evidence. In denial perhaps, but not unfamiliar:
So, how have they managed to cover up the Lockerbie frame-up for 17 years?
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=125x177149
As emerged in 2007, CIA offered millions to the key witnesses in the case against Megrahi - a piece of information the prosecution forgot to tell the defense, as would have been required.
The Herald, Scotland
http://www.theherald.co.uk/news/news/display.var.1730667.0.0.php
SNIP
The Scottish Criminal Cases Review Commission found document during its three-year investigation, which concluded earlier this year that Megrahi should have a fresh appeal.
The document, thought to be from the CIA, contains highly classified information about the MST13 timer which allegedly detonated the bomb. The Crown, for national security reasons, is still refusing to hand the material over to the defence.
SNIP
The Crown ultimately released Megrahi, avoiding the chance that his conviction would be reversed.
Again, your reply does not speak to my own post, or the subthread.
Nevertheless, there is a more clear-cut case:
Locater map depicting Iran Air 655's origination point, destination and approximate location of the shootdown. (The air corridor is not necessarily a direct path)
A missile departs the forward launcher of Vincennes during a 1987 exercise. The forward launcher was also used in the downing of Iran Air 655.
From Wikipedia: Iran Air Flight 655
What happened in that case is not in dispute.
Just more collateral murder.
Updating one of my posts from that Lockerbie thread:
Recalling the context
1) 1988: Vincennes downs Iranian airbus.
2) 1989: Lockerbie.
3) Circuit board found.
4) U.S. officials insinuate Syria as terror-sponsor state blew up Pan Am as contractor for Iran.
5) 1990: Iraq invades Kuwait.
6) U.S. switches to openly accusing Libya of Lockerbie bombing.
7) Bush Sr. visits Assad Sr. to recruit him for upcoming Gulf War. They appear together in Damascus.
8) Sanctions on Libya for more than decade.
9) Libya caves in, produces 2 suspects for Scottish trial (held in Netherlands).
10) One conviction. Libya pays ransom to lift sanctions, even as Gaddafi continues to deny the verdict.
11) After 9/11, Libya and U.S. reconcile, Gaddafi takes a moral membership in the GWoT, practically makes love with Bush Jr. (and Blair. Many arms deals with West, joint friendly summits with Western leaders follow.)
12) 15 years after Lockerbie, Scottish police chief says CIA planted circuit board.
13) Scottish review board orders retrial of convict.
14) 2009: Convict is released prior to completion of retrial.
15) 2011: Arab Spring, uprising in Libya. Overnight, Gaddafi is enemy again, US-UK propaganda rediscovers Lockerbie as an unpunished atrocity.
I think any U.S. credibility in making a case against Libya vanished somewhere between 6 and 7.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
112 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
"Osama bin Laden will never walk on this earth again" is the rhetoric we want to represent us? [View all]
Bonobo
Jan 2012
OP
The 2 principal war criminals won't have to come to trial and I'm very happy they are out of the way
phleshdef
Jan 2012
#10
I said Truman's statement was an example of a Democrat using the same kind of rhetoric.
phleshdef
Jan 2012
#35
The circuit board is impeached by one person. Other evidence shows that Libya had possession
Bolo Boffin
Jan 2012
#60
Edwin Bollier? The guy who also claimed Gaddafi offered him $200M to get Megrahi free?
Bolo Boffin
Jan 2012
#72
Really? I've been proven wrong? I'm not noticing a lot of responses to my #94.
Bolo Boffin
Jan 2012
#107
JackRiddler I used to think Megrahi did bomb the plane, but your logic and facts are solid.
Zalatix
Jan 2012
#64
" Libya was framed for the Lockerbie bombing is MSM sourced" Gross overstatement
Bolo Boffin
Jan 2012
#61
Who in the world releases someone who kills 300 people for "Compassion" reasons? Really?
Zalatix
Jan 2012
#68
And despite all this overwhelming evidence, a re-trial was planned for him. How do you explain that?
Zalatix
Jan 2012
#82
Because the defense wasn't told about the CIA offer to Gauci. A technicality.
Bolo Boffin
Jan 2012
#84
Apples & Oranges. Ted Stevens was accused of political corruption, not terrorism/mass murder.
Zalatix
Jan 2012
#90
Don't you know? He had OVERWHELMING evidence against him. Yet a re-trial was approved.
Zalatix
Jan 2012
#83
You know, when you put it in ALLCAPS like that, it feels more overwhelming!
JackRiddler
Jan 2012
#88
Here's another good point - the actual summary of referral from the Scottish review board
Bolo Boffin
Jan 2012
#94
US or international politics of it all aside, bin Laden's demise was bluntly necessary, imo.
pinto
Jan 2012
#12
Bluntly necessary? To shoot rather than capture the best source of intelligence?
JackRiddler
Jan 2012
#55
If osama truly was the criminal mastermind behind deaths of thousands and thousands of innocents
Muskypundit
Jan 2012
#14
Personally, I'm glad that particular shithead is dead. If that makes me a bad man, I'm a bad man.
Warren DeMontague
Jan 2012
#21
This is the first I've heard of this particular statement by the President
Warren DeMontague
Jan 2012
#25
I considered the capture or killing of Bin Laden as a worthy goal of our government.
MilesColtrane
Jan 2012
#27
Right up there with Americans screaming, USA! USA!, teeth clenched and veins
truth2power
Jan 2012
#41
Don't like that phrase, but winning the war against terrorism sounds pretty good...
JCMach1
Jan 2012
#46
Just run Gingrich as a (D)--if we are EXACTLY like them, they won't be able to criticize us!
Romulox
Jan 2012
#57
Not if Gingrich (D) is the nominee, as I suggested earlier. How could they criticize ANYTHING,
Romulox
Jan 2012
#104
Yep! He was directly responsible for ordering the deaths of thousands of people
Liberal_Stalwart71
Jan 2012
#58
First off, their is no such thing as a soul, but to go ahead and continue your thought process...
snooper2
Jan 2012
#66
