Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

tabatha

(18,795 posts)
2. How do you know it was a "terrorist" attack?
Thu Jan 12, 2012, 10:15 AM
Jan 2012

It has been 10 months now, and the Syrian govt is so incompetent that they have not caught any terrorists or managed to stop them?

Why are they spending their time shooting unarmed protesters and not concentrating on so-called terrorists?

Because there are no terrorists. The monitors have found only unarmed protesters.

Your continued claims of unsubstantiated charges is becoming increasingly incredible.

Also - think about the so-called terrorist attacks.

The demonstrators wanted to prove more than anything that they were simply unarmed protesters. The last thing that would have crossed their minds was to bomb and prove Assad's claims. The only side that would have benefited by the so called bombings would have been Assad. Thus, even the logic of bombings by so-called terrorists makes no sense.

The Arab League pretty much knows what is going on - Assad has not adhered to a single requirement, and has tried to bamboozle the monitors - including the false terrorist attacks.

Your bias is definitely showing.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»HRW: Syria: Army Shoots P...»Reply #2