Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Steelrolled

(2,022 posts)
42. Could you image if we had an Apollo-like program for Nuclear Power 2.0 starting in the mid-2000s?
Tue Aug 31, 2021, 12:04 AM
Aug 2021

One with modern design, much greater standardization for lower cost and improved safety, and regulatory approval processes commensurate with the risk of delay?

One that would have inspired young engineers, construction works, managers, et al?

One with a parallel Power Grid 2.0 with greater capacity for EVs, more electric heating, and for distributed wind/solar power sources?

One with a level of federal spending on the main project, plus billions for "supporting" (aka pork) projects, that could have gained bipartisan support, and would have been loved by Wall St?

One, which by year 2021, would be well on its way to eliminating all coal plants, and most natural gas plants, and at the same time further reducing energy imports?

Sadly, anti-science had the bigger voice.

I would like to think we could still do it, but I can't.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

So your view is that we can only deal with one issue at a time? brooklynite Aug 2021 #1
Right? CrackityJones75 Aug 2021 #6
More to the point, since we don't all agree that COVID is most important... brooklynite Aug 2021 #15
We don't see much evidence of people walking and chewing gun at the same time Kaleva Aug 2021 #35
I am equally pessimistic genxlib Aug 2021 #2
Elysium DanieRains Aug 2021 #3
Greed, and the stupid it fosters, will prevent any significant action on climate change. Roisin Ni Fiachra Aug 2021 #4
Of course humans will solve it. CrackityJones75 Aug 2021 #5
Water, wind, and fire... ananda Aug 2021 #7
All you need to do is convert a system sourcing 160,000 billion KWhr / year to something else Klaralven Aug 2021 #8
Easy, peasy!! Xoan Aug 2021 #17
Amusingly, your own link lays out plans on how to do that. Pity that the issue is... Lancero Aug 2021 #38
People with lots of money make the decisions Chainfire Aug 2021 #9
Greed is one reason. marie999 Aug 2021 #10
Reflections Of A Late Middle Age Man modrepub Aug 2021 #11
we pretty much have to live like the Amish fescuerescue Aug 2021 #12
A net zero lifestyle isn't something most here would want. Kaleva Aug 2021 #34
They're not perfect, but the Amish use resources like diesel and gas. Niagara Aug 2021 #43
The climate crisis will solve humans. lagomorph777 Aug 2021 #13
Cheap sources of hydrocarbons will exhaust before climate change becomes the limiting factor Klaralven Aug 2021 #18
That's way outside mainstream scientific thinking. lagomorph777 Aug 2021 #19
Interesting ... dumbcat Aug 2021 #22
Before there was the IPCC there was the Club of Rome and "Limits to Growth" Klaralven Aug 2021 #37
"Once, in the past, somebody was wrong. Therefore everybody is always wrong." Binkie The Clown Aug 2021 #39
Actually, in the past the Club of Rome was right, and "Limits to Growth" has been vindicated. Klaralven Aug 2021 #41
I view voting rights as more important Elessar Zappa Aug 2021 #14
Voting rights are critically important. Nothing can be solved without fixing that. lagomorph777 Aug 2021 #16
Exactly! Elessar Zappa Aug 2021 #21
If the U.S. could solve the problem unilaterally, then you might be right. But it's a global problem Binkie The Clown Aug 2021 #40
The US can't fix climate alone, but we sure can break it alone. lagomorph777 Aug 2021 #44
Neither party seems focused on preparing the citizens to adapt. Kaleva Aug 2021 #36
The obvious solution is nuclear power. hunter Aug 2021 #20
Not many here are promoting fossil fuels. lagomorph777 Aug 2021 #23
What better storage? hunter Aug 2021 #24
Multiple storage options are coming online or in development. lagomorph777 Aug 2021 #25
Nuclear is much more suitable than the current alternatives cinematicdiversions Aug 2021 #26
False dichotomy. lagomorph777 Aug 2021 #27
Iceland (which I have been to multiple times) is a micro-state with extraordinarily unique Celerity Aug 2021 #31
Iceland has geothermal which provides energy 24/7 Kaleva Aug 2021 #33
The EROI (energy return on investment) for renewables is very poor versus nuclear Celerity Aug 2021 #28
Exactly, we must open our minds to nuclear. Elessar Zappa Aug 2021 #29
Could you image if we had an Apollo-like program for Nuclear Power 2.0 starting in the mid-2000s? Steelrolled Aug 2021 #42
Deep greenjar_01 Aug 2021 #30
We also have an endless amount of Fake Doctors, Scientists, Professors, Politicians, etc who keep SunImp Aug 2021 #32
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Why the human race will n...»Reply #42