Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Silent3

(15,909 posts)

26. Thanks

Reply to sl8 (Reply #22)

Wed Sep 1, 2021, 09:26 PM

Sep 2021

I guess they're trying to slightly limit the insanity of this bill to help protect it from being overturned, but, even totally aside from Roe v. Wade precedent, I just can't see how this concept of standing can be constitutional.

There might not be specific language in the US constitution regarding standing, but the courts have long enforced historical standards of jurisprudence as well, and by those standards, this seems to me a completely unworkable concept of standing.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

26 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Something I don't understand about this insane Texas abortion law [View all] Silent3 Sep 2021 OP

Good question. nt littlemissmartypants Sep 2021 #1

The law is designed to give private citizens "standing" MissMillie Sep 2021 #2

Or for polluting even if you can't prove direct personal harm. femmedem Sep 2021 #3

...or having a vasectomy. cbabe Sep 2021 #4

The courts can make anything a crime, and then allow random people to sue. Irish_Dem Sep 2021 #9

It will be interesting Mad_Machine76 Sep 2021 #5

If you get $10K, people will figure out how to do it. Irish_Dem Sep 2021 #10

Conservatism claimed to oppose the idea of anyone filing lawsuits. Dawson Leery Sep 2021 #6

I find organized religion abhorrent... orwell Sep 2021 #7

Can I sue the Catholic Church for raping children? maxrandb Sep 2021 #20

I like it... orwell Sep 2021 #24

The courts have yet to weigh in on the issue. marybourg Sep 2021 #8

It's not gonna work Dirty Socialist Sep 2021 #11

But it means an ass like RudyG can show up and accuse someone and sue Captain Zero Sep 2021 #13

I doubt it Dirty Socialist Sep 2021 #14

you do not have to be a texas citizen to sue under this law dsc Sep 2021 #17

Oh, I don't agree with you leftieNanner Sep 2021 #18

You just gave me an idea... ret5hd Sep 2021 #19

This is judicial chaos Buckeyeblue Sep 2021 #12

Can I show up and file a voter rights lawsuit? Captain Zero Sep 2021 #15

Agreed. Buckeyeblue Sep 2021 #23

I had a similar question: what other forms of speech can a legislature proclaim to be "actionable"? 0rganism Sep 2021 #16

Again, I'm wondering if it's going to be retroactive. hamsterjill Sep 2021 #21

Doesn't look like it: sl8 Sep 2021 #22

Thanks Silent3 Sep 2021 #26

it's about enabling anti abortion activists to be economic terrorists ZonkerHarris Sep 2021 #25