Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

marions ghost

(19,841 posts)
23. Excellent article--thank you--
Fri Oct 19, 2012, 12:22 PM
Oct 2012

From the article:

"What that means is they found some evidence of increase in glioma and acoustic neuroma brain cancer for mobile phone users, but have not been able to draw conclusions for other types of cancers.
---
The European Environmental Agency has pushed for more studies, saying cell phones could be as big a public health risk as smoking, asbestos and leaded gasoline. The head of a prominent cancer-research institute at the University of Pittsburgh sent a memo to all employees urging them to limit cell phone use because of a possible risk of cancer.

"When you look at cancer development -- particularly brain cancer -- it takes a long time to develop. I think it is a good idea to give the public some sort of warning that long-term exposure to radiation from your cell phone could possibly cause cancer," said Dr. Henry Lai, research professor in bioengineering at University of Washington who has studied radiation for more than 30 years.

Results from the largest international study on cell phones and cancer was released in 2010. It showed participants in the study who used a cell phone for 10 years or more had doubled the rate of brain glioma, a type of tumor. To date, there have been no long-term studies on the effects of cell phone usage among children."

----------

PS--my friend's tumor was glioma. Until I read this I didn't know that is the type most associated...

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Looks like a great article. Is it pro-viking? Quantess Oct 2012 #1
It's certainly not anti-Norse hootinholler Oct 2012 #5
:)) n/t JackN415 Oct 2012 #7
Thanks for that great link, hoot! hifiguy Oct 2012 #2
High school physics shows why it's impossible for cell phones to cause brain cancer? wtmusic Oct 2012 #3
Way to throw the baby out with the bathwater. hootinholler Oct 2012 #8
You would have to know the old SciAm. wtmusic Oct 2012 #10
I suppose having read it regularly for the mid '70s to the mid 90's doesn't count then. hootinholler Oct 2012 #13
It's encouraging that they didn't mention extraterrestrials anywhere in the first paragraph. nt wtmusic Oct 2012 #15
Well nowhere did he mention gravity waves either hootinholler Oct 2012 #17
A friend of mine was a young oncologist marions ghost Oct 2012 #21
Using the word "impossible" is the fairly predictable signature of a scientific poseur. wtmusic Oct 2012 #22
Excellent article--thank you-- marions ghost Oct 2012 #23
Bookmarking for later read LongTomH Oct 2012 #4
SCIENCE! tk2kewl Oct 2012 #6
Great Catch. littlemissmartypants Oct 2012 #9
Absolutely a great article ... 1StrongBlackMan Oct 2012 #11
Actually it should be when opinions carry the same weight as facts or something similar hootinholler Oct 2012 #18
Yes ... 1StrongBlackMan Oct 2012 #19
Empiracism back from the grave d_r Oct 2012 #12
Thought provoking but far from good science. It draws a false equivalency attributing Egalitarian Thug Oct 2012 #14
An interesting take on it. hootinholler Oct 2012 #16
Monsanto, Dow, Raytheon, DuPont, all the oil companies, GE, ad infinitum, have Egalitarian Thug Oct 2012 #20
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»An incredibly thought pro...»Reply #23