Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

andym

(6,068 posts)
5. Analysis: Supreme Court signals Roe vs. Wade will fall after allowing Texas to ban most abortions.
Sun Sep 5, 2021, 03:17 PM
Sep 2021
https://www.latimes.com/politics/story/2021-09-02/the-supreme-court-signals-that-roe-vs-wade-will-fall-now-that-texas-may-ban-early-abortions

"Legal analysts believe that this ruling signals the end of Roe V Wade."
BY DAVID G. SAVAGE STAFF WRITER
SEP. 2, 2021 2:08 PM PT

"WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court’s conservative majority has sent its strongest signal to date that Roe vs. Wade will fall, having given a green light to the nation’s second-most populous state to outlaw abortions after six weeks of pregnancy. The justices did not overturn the right to abortion in the order they released at 11:58 p.m. Eastern time Wednesday on the Texas case, and they might not formally overrule Roe vs. Wade later this year when they take up a case from Mississippi. But the five most conservative justices made it clear they would not protect women or their doctors if they face abortion-related penalties imposed by a state..

For the first time, President Trump’s three appointees joined together to rule in an abortion dispute, aligning with Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel A. Alito Jr., who have opposed abortion rights in court opinions for more than 30 years. The justices rejected an appeal from physicians in Texas and left in place a law that says it is illegal for a doctor to perform an abortion if a fetal heartbeat can be detected."

Florida State University law professor Mary Ziegler, an expert on the history of abortion law, said the decision pointed to the demise of Roe. “I think that any court that took the right to abortion seriously would have stayed this law,” she said. “I think the real question is how and when the court overrules Roe. It may not be in Dobbs [the case from Mississippi], but the end of Roe seems inevitable.”

“The only way to understand the court’s action,” said Erwin Chemerinsky, dean of the UC Berkeley School of Law, “is that there are five votes to overrule Roe vs. Wade. “Given their desire to do so and their opposition to abortion rights,” he said, “they could not bring themselves to block the Texas law. The law bans, effectively, abortions after the sixth week of pregnancy. That obviously cannot be reconciled with Roe.”
---------
Of course the analysts could be wrong, but...

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Thank's for the clarity! Kittycatkat Sep 2021 #1
Half the clickbait merchants are spreading misinfo to create outrage. WarGamer Sep 2021 #2
Thanks for the confirmation which I sincerely believed ..... Lovie777 Sep 2021 #3
The cake is still in the oven... WarGamer Sep 2021 #4
tbh By that standard, the cake will remain in the oven. Forever. tbh LanternWaste Sep 2021 #36
To repeat... WarGamer Sep 2021 #37
Analysis: Supreme Court signals Roe vs. Wade will fall after allowing Texas to ban most abortions. andym Sep 2021 #5
right. there's a certain amount of pussyfoot here stopdiggin Sep 2021 #8
Other Avenues Possible DallasNE Sep 2021 #26
Justice Sotomayor was pretty worked up about it too Danascot Sep 2021 #28
Also this Danascot Sep 2021 #35
you're correct stopdiggin Sep 2021 #6
When in the last 50 years do you suppose Democrats had the votes in Congress to codify abortion tritsofme Sep 2021 #7
you're also correct stopdiggin Sep 2021 #9
Democrats have had majorities, but not necessarily pro-choice ones, not even today. tritsofme Sep 2021 #13
In the House we do today dsc Sep 2021 #27
that depends A LOT on what you call stopdiggin Sep 2021 #38
Screw That Get Angry nvme Sep 2021 #10
In Texas... carpetbagger Sep 2021 #15
Yes, but it's still friggin' outrageous they let this monstrosity stand and it seems likely the LymphocyteLover Sep 2021 #11
What are you trying to do, Mr.Bill Sep 2021 #12
The truth is not a good a story. Besides, people don't seem to demand the truth. Hoyt Sep 2021 #14
Who doesn't already know what you posted? SharonClark Sep 2021 #16
Yea, I'm gonna go with Sotomayor. Treefrog Sep 2021 #30
So many people think they ended it because effectively that's what they did kcr Sep 2021 #17
Exactly. SharonClark Sep 2021 #18
Yep berniesandersmittens Sep 2021 #20
They did not overturn Roe v. Wade, but they did allow the Texas law to effectively end abortion Lonestarblue Sep 2021 #19
Well, if we're insisting on punctilious accuracy dpibel Sep 2021 #21
**"In reaching this conclusion," the opinion said, elleng Sep 2021 #22
Clarity & reading comprehension matter! CaptainTruth Sep 2021 #23
Woong In One Regard DallasNE Sep 2021 #24
Shush shush, pat pat, don't get all paranoid at all that chipping away, chippies. ancianita Sep 2021 #25
They allowed harms to continue under the law, pending years of litigation RandomNumbers Sep 2021 #29
Honestly this is a bit disingenuous dsc Sep 2021 #31
It's worse than ruling on the Constitutionality of that law NullTuples Sep 2021 #32
There was a podcast on the local news radio station here a few days ago BumRushDaShow Sep 2021 #33
What the court did is unconscionable. themaguffin Sep 2021 #34
This message was self-deleted by its author dalton99a Sep 2021 #39
K&R UTUSN Sep 2021 #40
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Misinformation alert... S...»Reply #5