Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Is DOJ hamstrung? I'm not sure under Garland's leadership that accountability and prosecution [View all]LetMyPeopleVote
(181,261 posts)38. Justice Department planning to sue Texas over abortion law
Link to tweet
The Department of Justice is planning to sue Texas as soon as this week, POLITICO has confirmed, a move that comes just days after Attorney General Merrick Garland said his department is exploring options to challenge the states strict abortion law.
While the lawsuit could come as soon as Thursday, its possible the timeline will be pushed back, according to The Wall Street Journal, which first reported the Justice Departments preparations. The Biden administration has faced building pressure to act after the Supreme Court allowed the law to take effect in a 5-4 decision.
The Justice Departments lawsuit is expected to argue that the Texas law illegally interferes with federal interests.
The new Texas law, SB 8, bans abortions once medical professionals can detect cardiac activity, usually around six weeks, before some women even know they are pregnant. The law places enforcement responsibilities on private parties, by incentivizing individuals who can recover $10,000 or more if they win a case against a party they accuse of performing or aiding in an abortion. By putting enforcement powers in the hands of private citizens, instead of state or local government officials, it leaves opponents of the bill without an obvious party to sue.
While the lawsuit could come as soon as Thursday, its possible the timeline will be pushed back, according to The Wall Street Journal, which first reported the Justice Departments preparations. The Biden administration has faced building pressure to act after the Supreme Court allowed the law to take effect in a 5-4 decision.
The Justice Departments lawsuit is expected to argue that the Texas law illegally interferes with federal interests.
The new Texas law, SB 8, bans abortions once medical professionals can detect cardiac activity, usually around six weeks, before some women even know they are pregnant. The law places enforcement responsibilities on private parties, by incentivizing individuals who can recover $10,000 or more if they win a case against a party they accuse of performing or aiding in an abortion. By putting enforcement powers in the hands of private citizens, instead of state or local government officials, it leaves opponents of the bill without an obvious party to sue.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
46 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Is DOJ hamstrung? I'm not sure under Garland's leadership that accountability and prosecution [View all]
Evolve Dammit
Sep 2021
OP
They are not required to give us updates. They are there doing their job! And it takes time
PortTack
Sep 2021
#6
Maybe DOJ needs a point person then, because we're running out of justice and perhaps democracy.
Evolve Dammit
Sep 2021
#15
I agree. They are competent career people. But there has been limited action.
Evolve Dammit
Sep 2021
#10
Yeah and we were going to close Guantanamo too. Nobody is above the law seems a joke.
Evolve Dammit
Sep 2021
#13
We need to name names. Who the hell is calling these shots? It ain't We the people.
Evolve Dammit
Sep 2021
#35
I think Biden appointed Garland specifically because he wouldn't do anything that might look
Poiuyt
Sep 2021
#24
If that's true, and it well might be, it is potentially democracy-breaking. If DOJ is reduced to
Evolve Dammit
Sep 2021
#36
They're busy printing up parking and jaywalking tickets for the traitors to plead to.
NBachers
Sep 2021
#33
So far it sure feels that way. Most of the country has moved on, and the hearings aren't even news.
Evolve Dammit
Sep 2021
#37
Oh woe is me, oh gloom and doom, the world is ending. Well done you: there's like twodozen people...
Hekate
Sep 2021
#40
pretty darn close; read the Rules. I don't think Buddha or DU would like that
Evolve Dammit
Sep 2021
#45
When operating properly, DoJ doesn't "announce" who or what it is investigating...
Wounded Bear
Sep 2021
#42