Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

DisgustipatedinCA

(12,530 posts)
5. Sounds great, until you try to find reasons behind Romney's rise. There are none.
Fri Oct 19, 2012, 05:25 PM
Oct 2012

-Romney looked foolish at the debate.
-The jobs numbers are looking better than they have since 2008.
-Romney has NO natural constituency beyond the top 1%.
-Republicans still hate Romney (even if they're not able to remember 3 months ago when they professed to hate him).
-Romney has no plan significantly different than the plans of the failed president GW Bush.

So what does account for this sudden rise in Romney's numbers? Oh yeah, Chuck Todd and Politico, among others.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

You know the media wants to have a close race for ratings. hrmjustin Oct 2012 #1
I suspect that, but these two are partisan hacks, and it shows still_one Oct 2012 #2
and he is a loudmouth that never shuts up. I stopped watching him this election. hrmjustin Oct 2012 #3
Actually I stopped watching him when he started kissing george bushes ass in 2000 /nt still_one Oct 2012 #4
he admitted once to voting for shrub. hrmjustin Oct 2012 #7
I think I recall reading that here a while back. That says more about him than anything, and why still_one Oct 2012 #9
Sounds great, until you try to find reasons behind Romney's rise. There are none. DisgustipatedinCA Oct 2012 #5
I don't think he is rising, Romney that is, if you look at the swing states. The south in general still_one Oct 2012 #10
It all defies logic! We know better. Glimmer of Hope Oct 2012 #18
Toad was even biased towards Rmoney after Bohunk68 Oct 2012 #6
The media wants a replay of 2000...period! BluegrassDem Oct 2012 #8
Check out this propaganda... deaniac21 Oct 2012 #11
I'm totally and unreservedly shocked! Shocked, I tell you!! NOT. nt. OldDem2012 Oct 2012 #12
I thought I heard Matthews suggest that something is wrong with the polls aint_no_life_nowhere Oct 2012 #13
I had to go so I don't know, but regardless I still do not care for him, though I do agree that the still_one Oct 2012 #15
Yep! 68 Rex Oct 2012 #14
Compared to the others, at least they have some progressives, which is good still_one Oct 2012 #16
Todd is a Democrat, I think, and is a numbers guy. He's usu. pretty fair. That other guy... Honeycombe8 Oct 2012 #17
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»gee matthews has both toa...»Reply #5