Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
31. I agree with TheMadMonk completely.
Wed Dec 14, 2011, 10:24 AM
Dec 2011

There will not be "devastating consequences for... Japan... and North America" requiring "mass evacuations" when the tower that Ethan A. Huff is alarmed about collapses. Most of the nuclear fuel rods that were housed at Fukushima Daiichi are not there anymore. The de facto director of the CiA, Dr. John Chadwick Rockwell, who I have known since we were students together at Northwestern University in the early 1980s, ignited them, with three days of bombardment from the laser weapon in Gakona, Alaska officially known as HAARP, causing them to melt down and through their containment vessels, pour out of exhaust ducts, spill over bedrock and foul, not just a nearby area twenty times the size of Manhattan but also, through efforts to bring their temperature down, most of the land and water in the northern hemisphere and all the world's oceans, for the next hundred thousand years. The unnamed source who told Care News otherwise is wrong.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

This is a nuclear disaster that CANNOT be fixed ... will just have to live with it Blackhatjack Dec 2011 #1
This will affect the world Angry Dragon Dec 2011 #9
No. Both the OP and the post you're responding to are full of it. TheWraith Dec 2011 #28
Okay Angry Dragon Dec 2011 #29
An INDEPENDENTLY ACCREDITED expert? TheMadMonk Dec 2011 #12
That is a very interesting post, MadMonk Lasher Dec 2011 #13
I agree with TheMadMonk completely. ChiefHuntingBear Dec 2011 #31
Has this "nuclear expert" ever seen Chernobyl? FBaggins Dec 2011 #16
FBaggins, where did you get the pics from? FourScore Dec 2011 #18
Some blog that I can't get to. Sorry. FBaggins Dec 2011 #21
k&r nt bananas Dec 2011 #2
That really is scary to say the least. Between the bombs of the Second teddy51 Dec 2011 #3
What does this have to do with Lindsay Lohan? underpants Dec 2011 #4
If they even air it then! weedle Dec 2011 #10
they will. you have better faith in them then I do. n/t. okieinpain Dec 2011 #25
I've followed this as closely as I could and as I recall this is one of the nightmare senarios jimlup Dec 2011 #5
Jumping to conclusions FBaggins Dec 2011 #17
Sure and we should be careful you are right. jimlup Dec 2011 #23
We may "know already that TEPCO will not tell us the truth", but this source is even worse. FBaggins Dec 2011 #30
We were warned malaise Dec 2011 #6
this is so big FirstLight Dec 2011 #7
With all Japan's troubles regarding the tsunami and nuclear reactors, MoonRiver Dec 2011 #8
Meh.. The USA took funds away from their desperate people to hunt sentient bipeds.. Fumesucker Dec 2011 #15
Two wrongs don't make a right. n/t MoonRiver Dec 2011 #32
I would stop buying anything from Japan weedle Dec 2011 #11
Good luck with that. boppers Dec 2011 #14
Unfort. your right weedle Dec 2011 #24
Do the fish products you buy in the market.... bvar22 Dec 2011 #22
I think this should be moved to creative speculation snooper2 Dec 2011 #19
I think adults can determine for themselves what to believe or give Remember Me Dec 2011 #26
Action Item Blacksheep214 Dec 2011 #20
Too late now, but I thought a massive cofferdam could have helped WhatsNext Dec 2011 #27
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Fukushima: Reactor 4 is F...»Reply #31