Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

dsc

(53,445 posts)

2. but this is one I don't have a massive problem with

Reply to PoliticAverse (Reply #1)

Mon Sep 13, 2021, 09:10 PM

Sep 2021

since the feds refuse to provide even basic anti poverty measures leaving it to the states, meaning that states have to have high taxes to provide those services. I don't have a massive problem with having those be deductable.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

5 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

SALT Deduction Cap to Get 'Meaningful' Fix, Democrats Say [View all] Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Sep 2021 OP

"Restoring the full deduction would cost the U.S. Treasury $88.7 billion in lost revenue for 2021" PoliticAverse Sep 2021 #1

but this is one I don't have a massive problem with dsc Sep 2021 #2

The Federal government operates at a large deficit. Every dollar less in tax revenue means... PoliticAverse Sep 2021 #3

but it is writing off taxes paid to states dsc Sep 2021 #4

I really think that this is one of those tax breaks for the rich fescuerescue Sep 2021 #5