Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: So they gave a lot of private stuff about Trayvon to Zimmerman's lawyer, huh? [View all]former-republican
(2,163 posts)24. It can be a man fighting off an attacker also
Age of victim and attacker , physical condition of victim all come into play.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
42 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
So they gave a lot of private stuff about Trayvon to Zimmerman's lawyer, huh? [View all]
Stinky The Clown
Oct 2012
OP
either way you won't get 12 jurors? to convict him on 2nd degree murder
former-republican
Oct 2012
#3
Can you kindly tell me what is it that gives you the impression that Zimmerman will walk?
Hutzpa
Oct 2012
#31
Are you saying he did not commit a crime or that a jury will not convict
ProgressiveProfessor
Oct 2012
#13
I want to recall that there as been discussion previously of lesser charges
ProgressiveProfessor
Oct 2012
#28
It appears that Manslaughter and Third Degree Murder are lesser included offenses for Zimmerman
Kennah
Oct 2012
#30
In some states they can drop the lesser charges to pressure the jury with only one option.
ProgressiveProfessor
Oct 2012
#32
Every attorney fights to protect their client's privacy--nothing suspicious there. But, if the
Xedniw
Oct 2012
#15
Zimmerman's defense has a right to this information, unlike a rape victim's info because
Xedniw
Oct 2012
#14
Uh, pulling a gun and killing someone isn't considered self-defense against an un-armed person.
JaneyVee
Oct 2012
#19
Yes--and here's an OP I wrote about it--it's a point being missed in the noise.
msanthrope
Oct 2012
#29
Martin was a minor, but not what the law would call a child. He was months away from being an adult.
Honeycombe8
Oct 2012
#39