General Discussion

StarfishSaver

(18,486 posts)

27. There was absolutely nothing rude about my comment.

Reply to Grasswire2 (Reply #22)

Sat Sep 18, 2021, 03:57 PM

Sep 2021

But I thought you weren't engaging ...

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

61 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

New York state and city prosecutors have been investigating Trump's crimes for years [View all] StarfishSaver Sep 2021 OP

'investigations like this are long, complicated, and confidential elleng Sep 2021 #1

Justice delayed... Karadeniz Sep 2021 #2

Taking time to properly investigate a case is neither a delay or a denial of justice StarfishSaver Sep 2021 #3

it is if statutes of limitations run out bigtree Sep 2021 #8

I'm quite sure the DOJ attorneys are very familiar with the statutes of limitations they're working StarfishSaver Sep 2021 #17

problem with state prosecutions bigtree Sep 2021 #24

I agree with you on this issue 99% of the time, however... Fiendish Thingy Sep 2021 #18

How are you calculating that? StarfishSaver Sep 2021 #28

Trump wrote the checks to Daniels and McDougal in late October 2016 Fiendish Thingy Sep 2021 #41

The statute of limitations doesn't necessarily expires 5 years after the crime was first committed StarfishSaver Sep 2021 #42

Outside of RICO, aren't most indictments specific to individual acts, not patterns or series of acts Fiendish Thingy Sep 2021 #43

Not necessarily StarfishSaver Sep 2021 #44

Yes indeed, but if he were to be convicted of the same charges as Cohen, as "Individual 1" Fiendish Thingy Sep 2021 #45

Judges rarely make sentences consecutive, so it probably wouldn't make much difference StarfishSaver Sep 2021 #48

People were too busy accusing Tish James of wanting to replace Cuomo as Governor..... brooklynite Sep 2021 #4

Agree 100% FrankBooth Sep 2021 #5

Excellent point! MineralMan Sep 2021 #6

Cy Vance gets tons of criticism. Marius25 Sep 2021 #7

well deserved criticism. choie Sep 2021 #12

Thanks for the reminder. nt mcar Sep 2021 #9

Accountability - I Thought That My Earlier Post Here Might Contribute To This Discussion..... global1 Sep 2021 #10

This is quite fair to point out, but it's still a clear indication of a two-tier "justice" system Silent3 Sep 2021 #11

Thank you. lamp_shade Sep 2021 #13

the past 20+ years has been one hell stillcool Sep 2021 #14

If the truth be known...? kentuck Sep 2021 #15

I doubt the FBI conducted any serious investigation of him before he became president StarfishSaver Sep 2021 #21

I've been holding my tongue, though I have gone after Vance, I simply never trusted him msfiddlestix Sep 2021 #16

Do you at least understand that Vance is conducting an investigation even though StarfishSaver Sep 2021 #19

No need to be rude to that commenter. nt Grasswire2 Sep 2021 #22

There was absolutely nothing rude about my comment. StarfishSaver Sep 2021 #27

I think he's conducting a cover up. msfiddlestix Sep 2021 #30

You seem to have missed quite a bit StarfishSaver Sep 2021 #37

I just re-read your op. In my reading your other posts in the thread msfiddlestix Sep 2021 #34

I think you have missed the point altogether StarfishSaver Sep 2021 #38

Ok. I also understood you to say, that the investigations are over msfiddlestix Sep 2021 #39

I didn't say that - just the opposite StarfishSaver Sep 2021 #40

Will the Public be informed in either case? msfiddlestix Sep 2021 #46

If the grand jury issues indictments, yes. StarfishSaver Sep 2021 #49

Another reason not to make public anything related to TFG .. msfiddlestix Sep 2021 #50

I don't understand your point about a delay helping him StarfishSaver Sep 2021 #51

The more time the "wheels of justices" slpgs along, the closer it is for 2024 to get underway msfiddlestix Sep 2021 #52

You may need to lower your expectations StarfishSaver Sep 2021 #53

HRC was the anomaly, right? The "exception to the Rule" per Comey, if I recall correctly msfiddlestix Sep 2021 #59

Exactly - she was an anomaly, but not for the reason you seem to think StarfishSaver Sep 2021 #60

I don't see any divergence between what I said and your rephrasing. msfiddlestix Sep 2021 #61

the history of Vance is enough to make a person wary here Grasswire2 Sep 2021 #20

You think he went through all that trouble to get Trump's financial documents just for fun? StarfishSaver Sep 2021 #23

Not engaging. nt Grasswire2 Sep 2021 #25

Good idea StarfishSaver Sep 2021 #26

I missed that report.. msfiddlestix Sep 2021 #32

Yes, it went to the Supreme Court StarfishSaver Sep 2021 #36

thank you.. glad to know. n/t msfiddlestix Sep 2021 #47

indeed. Looks like he's going to live up to his reputation.. msfiddlestix Sep 2021 #35

If Trump is not indicated and successfully prosecuted, Garland is a failure. PufPuf23 Sep 2021 #29

Who looked the other way for all of those years? rockfordfile Sep 2021 #31

A guy named Rudy, to name one. Mr.Bill Sep 2021 #33

Really? former9thward Sep 2021 #54

During his tenure, yes. Mr.Bill Sep 2021 #55

Who are you blaming for the last 32 years? former9thward Sep 2021 #56

I don't have enough knowledge of NYC prosecutors Mr.Bill Sep 2021 #57

Giuliani was not a NYC prosecutor. former9thward Sep 2021 #58