Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

They Need To Find One Who'll Rule Right, Sir The Magistrate Sep 2021 #1
She is hired to faithfully interpret the rules. tritsofme Sep 2021 #2
Thanks elleng Sep 2021 #5
not the point. Don't obfuscate. triron Sep 2021 #6
It's the entire point. Demonizing the parliamentarian is the definition of obfuscation tritsofme Sep 2021 #8
That,'s precisely the point StarfishSaver Sep 2021 #15
Putting In A New One Is Changing The Rules, Sir The Magistrate Sep 2021 #9
Your criticism is absurd and ignorant. tritsofme Sep 2021 #10
Your View, Sir The Magistrate Sep 2021 #11
Again, your criticism should be aimed at senators tritsofme Sep 2021 #14
What's the point of having a parliamentarian StarfishSaver Sep 2021 #17
At The Risk Of Repeating Myself, Ma'am The Magistrate Sep 2021 #20
Yes, I read what you wrote previously. StarfishSaver Sep 2021 #22
We Are At A Point, Ma'am The Magistrate Sep 2021 #24
Right back atcha, my dear StarfishSaver Sep 2021 #26
No, she laid out facts, any ignorance on your part notwithstanding. tritsofme Sep 2021 #28
Re: that disastrous course FBaggins Sep 2021 #30
I don't believe it is correct that courts can strike down a law based on noncompliance with tritsofme Sep 2021 #33
I wish this post could be pinned to the top of the page Devil Child Sep 2021 #32
Putting in a new parliamentarian to interpret the rules the way you want StarfishSaver Sep 2021 #16
Absolutely correct - but it's also worth nothing that this isn't just "interpreting the rules" FBaggins Sep 2021 #21
Yes and no StarfishSaver Sep 2021 #25
All true FBaggins Sep 2021 #27
These arguments are ridiculous StarfishSaver Sep 2021 #29
You say "ridiculous" - I say "deadly" FBaggins Sep 2021 #31
Thank you StarfishSaver Sep 2021 #13
Thank your for the sane and logical take tritsofme Devil Child Sep 2021 #23
Absolutely agreed. ColinC Sep 2021 #4
Filibuster is now killabuster Walleye Sep 2021 #3
Completely expected. Did the Democrats have 50 votes for that proposal? n/t PoliticAverse Sep 2021 #7
That Is A Good Question, Sir The Magistrate Sep 2021 #12
Perhaps the leadership knows they don't have the 50 votes and were looking for the Parliamentarian PoliticAverse Sep 2021 #18
Sens. Durbin and Padilla say they have a plan B following the Senate parliamentarian's ruling LetMyPeopleVote Sep 2021 #19
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Senate parliamentarian de...»Reply #13