General Discussion

bvar22

(39,909 posts)

22. "I can't imagine that OWS was the impetus for the writing of this law"

Thu Jan 12, 2012, 01:25 PM

Jan 2012

...maybe not THIS year,
but if it grows and becomes more powerful?

...if there is a continued decline of the Working Class?

....if the House of Cards collapses, and there are MILLIONS of really hungry Americans banging on The Gates?

[font size=5 color=green][center]Solidarity99![/font][font size=2 color=green]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------[/center]

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

40 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

What caused an unholy trinity of Republicans, Democrats and the President to trash the Constitution? [View all] Better Believe It Jan 2012 OP

Money is the simplest and most logical explanation. LonePirate Jan 2012 #1

Or, in THIS case, bvar22 Jan 2012 #21

Obama signing that law is beyond the pale. So what if he won't use it. roguevalley Jan 2012 #34

Power corrupts..... vi5 Jan 2012 #2

Lord Acton ProfessorGAC Jan 2012 #38

"This law is, if I may be not overly dramatic, treasonous." DJ13 Jan 2012 #3

Ergo, the appeal of Ron Paul to many people. closeupready Jan 2012 #23

Oh please--have you ever seen Ron Paul in his swimsuit? n/t QC Jan 2012 #40

Apparently none are troubled by such piffles indepat Jan 2012 #24

The Unitary Presidency (institutionalized under Cheney/Bush) is the norm... SteveW Jan 2012 #4

FEMA camps...we're all going to FEMA camps. Old and In the Way Jan 2012 #5

Couple that with the Liebermann/Dent Bill making its' way through Congress and it's game, set match. Uncle Joe Jan 2012 #6

And control of the internet. woo me with science Jan 2012 #13

Interesting hypothesis. JDPriestly Jan 2012 #7

Very Interesting BeFree Jan 2012 #9

"I can't imagine that OWS was the impetus for the writing of this law" bvar22 Jan 2012 #22

consider the mannings of the world who will not save us for this. thanks, obama. roguevalley Jan 2012 #35

That language was write by Republicans and Obama had it taken OUT before he signed it and Welibs Jan 2012 #8

The author addresses that in the comments section: CrispyQ Jan 2012 #10

The next republican president will Autumn Jan 2012 #11

A signing statement doesn't mean jack shit . . . markpkessinger Jan 2012 #12

Mr. Obama works for Wall Street... lib2DaBone Jan 2012 #14

K&R woo me with science Jan 2012 #15

They say you can't fight what's comin'. I'd like to at least know what's coming. Poll_Blind Jan 2012 #16

We'd better damned well fight it now, woo me with science Jan 2012 #17

This correct and it is bipartisan. There is no just cause or good defense of the practices TheKentuckian Jan 2012 #18

No just cause, but I worry about their thinking. woo me with science Jan 2012 #30

The drug war. Warren DeMontague Jan 2012 #19

More like keeping that plant illegal in order to put folks in prison. a simple pattern Jan 2012 #37

The unfulfilled dreams of psychopaths. K&R (nt) T S Justly Jan 2012 #20

Post removed Post removed Jan 2012 #25

I thank the op for posting really important issues. Do you not think bbgrunt Jan 2012 #27

Post removed Post removed Jan 2012 #29

Those at the federal level are setting examples and providing weaponry for others at the local level AnotherMcIntosh Jan 2012 #26

I would like to know Proud Liberal Dem Jan 2012 #28

Our UNIFORMED troops are out of Iraq. AnotherMcIntosh Jan 2012 #31

War, and money. And the money that can be made from war. nt Romulox Jan 2012 #32

Fear. dawg Jan 2012 #33

I don't even know where to begin with this load of crap. MineralMan Jan 2012 #36

You could try to refute the article .... if you can. Better Believe It Jan 2012 #39