Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

StarfishSaver

(18,486 posts)
6. Thanks for posting this. From your link:
Fri Sep 24, 2021, 05:17 PM
Sep 2021
[In] Nixon v. Administrator of General Services (Nixon II) ... the Supreme Court determined that the protections of the presidential communications privilege survive beyond the conclusion of the presidential administration within which they occur and may be asserted by a former President. Nixon II involved a challenge brought by former-President Nixon to the Presidential Recordings and Materials Preservation Act, a records disposition law enacted shortly after President Nixon’s resignation, and a precursor to the PRA. In upholding the law, the Court concluded that a former President may “legitimately” assert the privilege to prevent disclosure of his official records after he has left office. In reaching that conclusion, the Court reasoned that the confidentiality necessary to ensure the free exchange of ideas between the President and his advisors cannot be measured by the few months or years between the submission of the information and the end of the President’s tenure; the privilege is not for the benefit of the President as an individual, but for the benefit of the Republic. Therefore the privilege survives the individual President’s tenure.
I guess this would be true even if the evidence is requested as part of a criminal investigation? wcmagumba Sep 2021 #1
No, it doesn't. StarfishSaver Sep 2021 #3
Okay, thanks for a great explanation, I'm not a lawyer but it sounds as though drumphy wcmagumba Sep 2021 #9
Glad to explain it - I know it's confusing. Even skilled lawyers are getting it wrong StarfishSaver Sep 2021 #12
Executive Privilege and Former Presidents: Constitutional Principles and Current Application PoliticAverse Sep 2021 #2
Thanks for posting this. From your link: StarfishSaver Sep 2021 #6
The key point I got from that document was... PoliticAverse Sep 2021 #10
Yes, I totally agree with that StarfishSaver Sep 2021 #11
It also says that is is the applied in the constitutional functions of a president Bev54 Sep 2021 #13
Yes - that's one of the reasons I think his attempt to claim executive privilege will fail StarfishSaver Sep 2021 #14
heard to assert doesnt mean they will actually get it IMO. nt msongs Sep 2021 #4
Exactly StarfishSaver Sep 2021 #7
I think people really under estimate how much power a former President still wields fescuerescue Sep 2021 #5
Possibly StarfishSaver Sep 2021 #8
Thanks for explanation Midnightwalk Sep 2021 #15
And the "heard to assert" fits with the rule that Trump has 60 days now to make this claim. pnwmom Sep 2021 #16
Kick StarfishSaver Sep 2021 #17
The current POTUS gets to make the decision on Executive Privilege LetMyPeopleVote Sep 2021 #18
Barbara McQuade is wrong.The decision is not solely up to Biden. StarfishSaver Sep 2021 #19
Biden White House leans toward releasing information about Trump and Jan. 6 attack, setting off lega LetMyPeopleVote Sep 2021 #20
You're missing the point StarfishSaver Sep 2021 #21
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Several legal pundits are...»Reply #6