Alito needs to be investigated. This is from 12/20

[jaxexpat]

40. The constitution is very clear on how to remedy recalcitrant USSC justices. I suggest reading it.

Article 3987 ^ Section $56.00, Sub-Section I-95, C-section 007:
When a group of at least 1200 people feel strongly (or can be convinced they feel strongly) enough about a judge on the USSC they shall meet wearing political slogans and cut-up pieces or the American flag, having no clue what an actual USSC justice actually does, and carrying any such makeshift weapons and chemical agents necessary; to climb the steps up to, onto and into the the Supreme Court Building and also by any other entrance they choose to create; whereupon they shall remove said offender if they can get past the capitol police. When, in the case of not being able to get past the police or which ever military force sworn to defend the constitution doth bothered to show up; they shall whine and brag and text to any and all media who has a phone (micro or smart) until they have provided adequate evidence for their prosecution by whoever has the duty rotation at that time. Should there still be some who would remove the offending judge; they must, and after no less than 10 months of acting out in public, go to his (her) home and take them from their bed in the wee hours of a night (no earlier that 12:45 AM and no later than 3:52 AM) and crucify (or something equally uncomfortable) said judge; thereby martyring him for posterity; and the next time ANY people try to build a just democracy; by encoding life-time appointments for Supreme Court judges; they'll know better.

is the following necessary? it was fun, anyway.