Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

FBaggins

(28,678 posts)
11. Exactly
Tue Sep 28, 2021, 03:54 PM
Sep 2021

From the same TPM blog linked in the OP:

If Topline Must Come Down, Wyden Favors Shortening Years Of Funding In Reconciliation Package

Amongst the procedural options that Democrats are exploring to end the impasse that moderates are causing over the reconciliation bill’s price tag, Senate Finance Committee chair Ron Wyden (D-OR) said that he would be in favor of shortening the number of years that the package is good for in order to shave down its topline.

Wyden declined to detail the number of years that the reconciliation bill should cover. It currently runs for 10 years.

“I’m not going to get into the number of years. I was asked if there are changes in the number topline, I personally in the caucus will talk about it,” Wyden said. “I personally would favor a shorter number of years.”


If Manchin says "ok... 2.5 Trillion", Wyden's strategy would be to leave everything in the bill and just play duration games such that the headline price tag hits that figure - but no actual change to the bill. Yet Manchin clearly wants some aspects of the bill to go away (you've pegged the most likely first one).

But he doesn't want to start there because he doesn't want to make ANY progress between now and a vote on infrastructure in the House.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Manchin Says He Made 'No ...»Reply #11