Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Free traders, and I mean all of them, worldwide, do you understand what's wrong here? [View all]Zalatix
(8,994 posts)46. It more than appears that your argument is both callous and incoherent.
First, you say that some of the richest people in the nation's history got so incredibly rich because of globalization in the early 1900s, then you turn around and argue that increases in CEO pay in the last 30 years are because of modern globalism. I don't see how you can have it both ways.
Yes I can. Because each time globalism CEO pay skyrocketed, it accompanied a rise in globalism. When globalism waned, CEO wages came back down to parity with workers' wages.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/05/02/ceo-pay-worker-pay_n_1471685.html
CEO Pay Grew 127 Times Faster Than Worker Pay Over Last 30 Years: Study
Yup, right after Reagan gutted us with globalism.
I've already pointed out that the US is listed as the 3rd largest exporter in the world.
You're being silly when you say this. Because you intentionally try to avoid the fact that our exports are dwarfed by our imports.
I didn't address your World Bank quote because it seemed irrelevant.[/quote]
Again, silly hour. It is at the very heart of the matter.
[quote] Since you insist, I sugest that you go back and read the quote over again. They recommended against other countries relying on exports because of a slowdown of richer nations decreasing their imports. In other words, they recommend that developing countries don't export goods to us because of the very policies that you're espousing.
Again, silly hour. It is at the very heart of the matter.
[quote] Since you insist, I sugest that you go back and read the quote over again. They recommended against other countries relying on exports because of a slowdown of richer nations decreasing their imports. In other words, they recommend that developing countries don't export goods to us because of the very policies that you're espousing.
No, they did not recommend that developing countries not export goods to us because of the very policies that I'm espousing. This is a lie. They recommended against other countries relying on exports because richer nations cannot afford to keep bleeding jobs to them.
You are attributing to policy what is an act of nature.
I'm not against American workers having jobs, but I'm also not for Americans having jobs just because they're Americans.
Well, I am for Americans having jobs because they're Americans. Savvy?
You need to get that straight. You and I will be forever at odds for that. This is called a Stand Your Ground moment, without the firearm. The line is being drawn by America's working class - today it is "This far and no further". Tomorrow it's "globalists, you will retreat".
You do not understand. America's working class will use political force to get their jobs back. They will take their jobs back. And when it starts, there will be nothing you can do to stop it.
Savvy?
The door has been slammed shut on American workers. The door slams both ways.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
54 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Free traders, and I mean all of them, worldwide, do you understand what's wrong here? [View all]
Zalatix
Oct 2012
OP
I could see some people being all jazzed about it if we were exploiting low wages
brewens
Oct 2012
#4
The GOP has learned from Germany's mistakes, and the mistakes of all before them.
Zalatix
Oct 2012
#12
By pointing out that "free trade" didn't lower prices, but just fattened corporate bottom lines
Populist_Prole
Oct 2012
#42
only if we rid the party of the corporatists and I don't see that happening anytime soon n/t
antigop
Oct 2012
#20
Are you kidding? Her husband invented the means to sell this Ponzi scheme to the sheeple.
Egalitarian Thug
Oct 2012
#23
K&R One quibble; they're just robbing Peter, Paul is still fucked. n/t
Egalitarian Thug
Oct 2012
#24
If free trade ended, what would you say to the 10 million Americans in export-supported jobs,
Nye Bevan
Oct 2012
#26
Yawn. What do you say to the 20 million who lost their jobs to offshoring? Nothing? Okthxbye!
Zalatix
Oct 2012
#32
Uh, no, they weren't, not like they are now. Not even close. Don't think you're fooling anyone.
Zalatix
Oct 2012
#39
Could it have had something to do with them importing Chinese labor to build railroads for a song?
Zalatix
Oct 2012
#41