Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Zalatix

(8,994 posts)
46. It more than appears that your argument is both callous and incoherent.
Sun Oct 21, 2012, 08:18 AM
Oct 2012
First, you say that some of the richest people in the nation's history got so incredibly rich because of globalization in the early 1900s, then you turn around and argue that increases in CEO pay in the last 30 years are because of modern globalism. I don't see how you can have it both ways.

Yes I can. Because each time globalism CEO pay skyrocketed, it accompanied a rise in globalism. When globalism waned, CEO wages came back down to parity with workers' wages.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/05/02/ceo-pay-worker-pay_n_1471685.html
CEO Pay Grew 127 Times Faster Than Worker Pay Over Last 30 Years: Study

Yup, right after Reagan gutted us with globalism.

I've already pointed out that the US is listed as the 3rd largest exporter in the world.

You're being silly when you say this. Because you intentionally try to avoid the fact that our exports are dwarfed by our imports.

I didn't address your World Bank quote because it seemed irrelevant.[/quote]
Again, silly hour. It is at the very heart of the matter.

[quote] Since you insist, I sugest that you go back and read the quote over again. They recommended against other countries relying on exports because of a slowdown of richer nations decreasing their imports. In other words, they recommend that developing countries don't export goods to us because of the very policies that you're espousing.

No, they did not recommend that developing countries not export goods to us because of the very policies that I'm espousing. This is a lie. They recommended against other countries relying on exports because richer nations cannot afford to keep bleeding jobs to them.

You are attributing to policy what is an act of nature.

I'm not against American workers having jobs, but I'm also not for Americans having jobs just because they're Americans.

Well, I am for Americans having jobs because they're Americans. Savvy?

You need to get that straight. You and I will be forever at odds for that. This is called a Stand Your Ground moment, without the firearm. The line is being drawn by America's working class - today it is "This far and no further". Tomorrow it's "globalists, you will retreat".

You do not understand. America's working class will use political force to get their jobs back. They will take their jobs back. And when it starts, there will be nothing you can do to stop it.

Savvy?

The door has been slammed shut on American workers. The door slams both ways.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

And by the way... dchill Oct 2012 #1
Get arrested for vagrancy undergroundpanther Oct 2012 #29
Best explanation of globalization ever !!! fleur-de-lisa Oct 2012 #2
Yes, please, steal it and use it as your own. Express permission. Zalatix Oct 2012 #3
Additional Sources mckara Oct 2012 #7
Impressive reading list. I must get those books. Zalatix Oct 2012 #16
I could see some people being all jazzed about it if we were exploiting low wages brewens Oct 2012 #4
This is why the GOP needs to be destroyed. Literally. BanTheGOP Oct 2012 #5
The GOP has learned from Germany's mistakes, and the mistakes of all before them. Zalatix Oct 2012 #12
Agreed undergroundpanther Oct 2012 #30
Fantastic post, saved for future viewing and reference Populist_Prole Oct 2012 #6
I argued these points w/ my soon-to-be ex (Stanford MBA) alittlelark Oct 2012 #8
Free trade is a bipartisan failure. hay rick Oct 2012 #9
My question to you is how do you convince the masses former-republican Oct 2012 #10
Oh JEEZ. That's the part they can LEAST understand. Zalatix Oct 2012 #14
lol former-republican Oct 2012 #15
Your Stuff Is Far From Way Out There. It Is Reality And A Fact. TheMastersNemesis Oct 2012 #22
By pointing out that "free trade" didn't lower prices, but just fattened corporate bottom lines Populist_Prole Oct 2012 #42
This is a thing of beauty and I'm not going to ruin it with my own commentary. pa28 Oct 2012 #11
Superb! WhaTHellsgoingonhere Oct 2012 #13
but, but, but....DLC Hillary says there are "advantages" to outsourcing antigop Oct 2012 #17
The war on America's working class is bipartisan. Zalatix Oct 2012 #19
only if we rid the party of the corporatists and I don't see that happening anytime soon n/t antigop Oct 2012 #20
Hillary needs to re-read the "Free trade is a win-win" memo. hay rick Oct 2012 #21
Are you kidding? Her husband invented the means to sell this Ponzi scheme to the sheeple. Egalitarian Thug Oct 2012 #23
Ya gotta crawl before ya can walk. hay rick Oct 2012 #25
!!! marions ghost Oct 2012 #18
K&R One quibble; they're just robbing Peter, Paul is still fucked. n/t Egalitarian Thug Oct 2012 #24
See, that's the point, Peter and Paul have to find a way to work together. Zalatix Oct 2012 #35
If free trade ended, what would you say to the 10 million Americans in export-supported jobs, Nye Bevan Oct 2012 #26
Yawn. What do you say to the 20 million who lost their jobs to offshoring? Nothing? Okthxbye! Zalatix Oct 2012 #32
Got a link for 20 million jobs lost to outsourcing? Nye Bevan Oct 2012 #48
I'm with you here, Zalatix. But free trade globalists are blinded by greed ~ Zorra Oct 2012 #27
The free trade globalists are intentionally bleeding the working class. Zalatix Oct 2012 #33
You might appreciate some of this discussion. moondust Oct 2012 #28
That's why I actively fought Clinton/Gore NAFTA upi402 Oct 2012 #31
oh, you guys. The current capitalist paradigm is based on... aletier_v Oct 2012 #34
What about the people in the countries that we outsource to? ComplimentarySwine Oct 2012 #35
See? You don't get it. I just told you, and you flat out didn't get it. Zalatix Oct 2012 #37
The thing is... ComplimentarySwine Oct 2012 #38
Uh, no, they weren't, not like they are now. Not even close. Don't think you're fooling anyone. Zalatix Oct 2012 #39
Please forgive me for referencing Wikipedia, but... ComplimentarySwine Oct 2012 #40
Could it have had something to do with them importing Chinese labor to build railroads for a song? Zalatix Oct 2012 #41
It appears that you haven't thought this through... ComplimentarySwine Oct 2012 #43
"I'm also not for Americans having jobs just because they're Americans" nolabels Oct 2012 #44
The dead giveaway was him/her implying Americans are not competitive. Zalatix Oct 2012 #47
It would seem easy to debate any of his positions nolabels Oct 2012 #49
It more than appears that your argument is both callous and incoherent. Zalatix Oct 2012 #46
"The US is the third largest exporter in the world". Nye Bevan Oct 2012 #50
The US has the largest trade deficit in the world. So what if we're the 3rd largest exporter? Zalatix Oct 2012 #53
But the plutocrats DO have feelings for American workers IDemo Oct 2012 #45
This message was self-deleted by its author bvar22 Oct 2012 #51
Well Done & DURec! bvar22 Oct 2012 #52
Of course they know. They don't care. They like those results. HiPointDem Oct 2012 #54
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Free traders, and I mean ...»Reply #46