Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: A Well Regulated Militia [View all]NickB79
(20,347 posts)35. Are there any other Amendments that speak of a collective right?
The 1st doesn't talk about the collective right to free speech, but of individual rights. As far as I've read, all other Amendments are for the right of the individual.
It would be incongruous that one Amendment was collective in this mix.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
80 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
To me it was always that to have a well regulate militia, the people have to be allowed to own guns.
brewens
Oct 2021
#7
A pretty small percentage of people owned guns in the first place in the Colonies. Take away that
brewens
Oct 2021
#30
to me its crystal clear - which is why we need to erase it from our constitution
Blues Heron
Oct 2021
#20
The quote is a clause, not a sentence, and it's deliberately removed from its context.
lagomorph777
Oct 2021
#63
You Are Refering To Individual State Constitutions At The Founding, Sir?
The Magistrate
Oct 2021
#48
The term "well regulated" can cover many things, including what types of firearms are regulation. So
dameatball
Oct 2021
#3
They probably should have said that we can own guns for the purpose of serving in a well
brewens
Oct 2021
#10
I contend that morons allowed open carry does not qualify as a "well regulated militia".
pecosbob
Oct 2021
#32
No - it's written as it's written. I don't have to defend the Founders here.
lagomorph777
Oct 2021
#71
The 2nd covers guns expected to be used by the militia - i.e. uniform military-grade arms.
BusterMove
Oct 2021
#36
From Scholar Carol Anderson: "a constitutional right to form militias to put down slave revolts"
usonian
Oct 2021
#37
Anderson isn't wrong about one of the southern state motivation, but she ignores the fact..
SYFROYH
Oct 2021
#59
Yup. But gun-humpers (even here) will give you all kinds of excuses to ignore the first clause.
lagomorph777
Oct 2021
#62