Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: SCOOP: Manchin tells associates he's considering leaving the Democratic Party [View all]LetMyPeopleVote
(181,245 posts)41. Biden is appointing judges faster than Trump, and most everyone else--for now
If MoscowMitch becomes Senate Majority Leader, Joe will not being appointing any judges
Link to tweet
By the August recess, the Senate had confirmed nine Biden judicial nominees. Between Feb. 25 and Aug. 8, 1969, the Democratic-led Senate confirmed 10 of Nixons lower-court nomineesand seated conservative Chief Justice Warren Burger by a lopsided vote 17 days after his nomination to replace liberal icon Earl Warren.
Nixons was a less-partisan confirmation environment. During his tumultuous five-and-a-half-year presidency, the Democratic Senate confirmed over 90% of his lower-court nominees (despite two Supreme Court nomination failures).....
Bidens aggressive nomination agenda and his nominees demographic and professional diversity probably reflect an effort to offset Trumps near-record number of confirmations and may mollify those pressing himunsuccessfullyto endorse major changes to the Supreme Court.
What explains his success to date?
First, he may be avoiding time-consuming nomination negotiations with Republican home-state senators. All of Bidens judicial nominees have been in states with no Republican senators (or no senators at allfor example, Washington, D.C.). Yet, as of early September, of the 59 district vacancies with no nominees, 16 are in states with at least one Republican senator. Of those 16 vacant judgeships, all but one of the incumbents had either left active status by March (creating the vacancy) or announced their intention to do so. The one nominee-less circuit vacancy, which the incumbent announced in February, is in red-state Kansas.
Nixons was a less-partisan confirmation environment. During his tumultuous five-and-a-half-year presidency, the Democratic Senate confirmed over 90% of his lower-court nominees (despite two Supreme Court nomination failures).....
Bidens aggressive nomination agenda and his nominees demographic and professional diversity probably reflect an effort to offset Trumps near-record number of confirmations and may mollify those pressing himunsuccessfullyto endorse major changes to the Supreme Court.
What explains his success to date?
First, he may be avoiding time-consuming nomination negotiations with Republican home-state senators. All of Bidens judicial nominees have been in states with no Republican senators (or no senators at allfor example, Washington, D.C.). Yet, as of early September, of the 59 district vacancies with no nominees, 16 are in states with at least one Republican senator. Of those 16 vacant judgeships, all but one of the incumbents had either left active status by March (creating the vacancy) or announced their intention to do so. The one nominee-less circuit vacancy, which the incumbent announced in February, is in red-state Kansas.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
119 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
SCOOP: Manchin tells associates he's considering leaving the Democratic Party [View all]
Nevilledog
Oct 2021
OP
I hate to see MoscowMitch having the power to block all judicial appointments
LetMyPeopleVote
Oct 2021
#17
Yes he would... we are getting lower court judges everyday...very very important...I can't believe
Demsrule86
Oct 2021
#58
As long as he caucuses with the Democrats and gives us the majority that is not true.
Demsrule86
Oct 2021
#103
Do understand if he leaves our party and caucuses with the GOP, we lose our senate majority and all
Demsrule86
Oct 2021
#55
As if becoming a Republican right now is a wise choice? When so many Republicans
True Blue American
Oct 2021
#74
I doubt Manchin cares about any voters other than the ones in WV that elected him to the Senate.
ShazzieB
Oct 2021
#86
that's my thinking too, so it occurs to me he has a plan for that outcome too
msfiddlestix
Oct 2021
#46
JFC. He's a child. This would make it a lot harder to maintain control of the Senate.
JoanofArgh
Oct 2021
#8
Yep. We can't allow that. The way to neutralize Manchin and Sinema is to elect more Democrats.
JoanofArgh
Oct 2021
#64
This could be why the president was telegraphing such significant changes to BBB
FBaggins
Oct 2021
#13
McConnell will give Manchin or Sinema anything...so no he won't be irrelevant.
Demsrule86
Oct 2021
#60
According to the article, he plans to change his voter registration from Democrat to independent.
ShazzieB
Oct 2021
#90
Say goodbye to our majority and more judges...without him...we have no shot at any policy.
Demsrule86
Oct 2021
#51
Biden is appointing judges faster than Trump, and most everyone else--for now
LetMyPeopleVote
Oct 2021
#41
According to the article, he plans to change his voter registration from Democrat to independent.
ShazzieB
Oct 2021
#89
No, he votes with us about 80 % of of the time...a GOP type never votes with us...we need the
Demsrule86
Oct 2021
#105
We have the majority because of Manchin. I would never want Mitch back in charge.
Demsrule86
Oct 2021
#106
Great than we can lose the majority by two Senators. Here is a question for you...where will
Demsrule86
Oct 2021
#107
Looks like Schumer will need to settle for $1.75 trillion and hopefully no less than that.
jaxexpat
Oct 2021
#82