Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

getagrip_already

(17,802 posts)
11. true, but not my point.....
Fri Oct 22, 2021, 11:39 AM
Oct 2021

The point was that judges have both the power and discretion to jail a person that doesn't show up when subpoenaed, even pre-trial. That is also a misdemeanor. In this case, a judge could simply order him to be held without bail pending trial since he has a history of not showing up.

It's a possible outcome with the right judge. Just because its a misdemeanor doesn't mean it is petty.

Not saying a judge would do this. They should though. A defendant shouldn't be able to break a law and realize the goals they sought by doing so.

And to your point, a defendant is never compelled to testify in court (witnesses are, but bannon won't be a witness if this ever goes to trial). There would be no need to invoke the fifth since he won't be called to testify unless he does so voluntarily.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»What happens if the US At...»Reply #11