General Discussion

ShazzieB

(22,370 posts)

75. Thank you for this comment.

Fri Oct 22, 2021, 08:14 PM

Oct 2021

And for your other comments in here. I am ready to scream at how many people here seem to think they know exactly what the AG's thoughts and intentions are and exactly what he is going to do or not to. It's ridiculous. 😱

Click here to purchase valentine hearts!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

90 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Why couldn't Garland just say [View all] Boydog Oct 2021 OP

Because it's against DOJ policy FBaggins Oct 2021 #1

Like I said Call Sally Yates Boydog Oct 2021 #3

The House just voted yesterday FBaggins Oct 2021 #4

K & R Thank You! Budi Oct 2021 #7

We'll see if he takes any action. Boydog Oct 2021 #9

Doncha know he's senile?!?!? AZSkiffyGeek Oct 2021 #10

Yup. And do it RFN!! Budi Oct 2021 #14

We are trying to enforce a damn subpoena Boydog Oct 2021 #34

Lock him away for a long time for ignoring a subpoena? AZSkiffyGeek Oct 2021 #40

No but this is Steve Freaking Bannon. Boydog Oct 2021 #41

That's not how it works. ShazzieB Oct 2021 #70

If tne slow moving, last resort, style of enforcement is the status quo... LiberalLovinLug Oct 2021 #89

Again, the DOJ just got the referral today mcar Oct 2021 #80

K & R "Again, the DOJ just got the referral today" Budi Oct 2021 #85

So many people know more than the experts mcar Oct 2021 #86

LOL.. 🥂 Budi Oct 2021 #87

You too Budi mcar Oct 2021 #88

"intentional targeted berrating bs"? Grasswire2 Oct 2021 #16

Lol. Suddenly EVERYBODY's a skilled Attorney General Budi Oct 2021 #19

Seems to me that one of the rules here is support Democrats AZSkiffyGeek Oct 2021 #20

Ya. No shit. Budi Oct 2021 #26

been me or you ,be in the can already ! monkeyman1 Oct 2021 #45

And would be out already Fiendish Thingy Oct 2021 #50

Is he a democrat? Why did Mitch and Bush promote him? Cetacea Oct 2021 #67

Lol. Why did they NOT seat him on the SC? Better explanation to the kerfuffel Budi Oct 2021 #71

That came later, to spite Obama. Cetacea Oct 2021 #81

Thank you 🙏🏽 live love laugh Oct 2021 #82

I think it actually goes to the US Attorney for whatever District DC is in. soldierant Oct 2021 #51

Yes. In fact, it already has been sent to theDC US Attorney, Channing Phillips onenote Oct 2021 #57

The US Attorneys are part of the DOJ FBaggins Oct 2021 #62

I love Biden but really wanted Sally Yates instead of Garland. Funtatlaguy Oct 2021 #18

I supported his nomination..... MyOwnPeace Oct 2021 #2

This message was self-deleted by its author Chin music Oct 2021 #8

Hear, hear. BigmanPigman Oct 2021 #61

Yeah, we need a non-timid AG. He doesn't inspire confidence... brush Oct 2021 #5

This message was self-deleted by its author Chin music Oct 2021 #11

hear, hear Grasswire2 Oct 2021 #17

This message was self-deleted by its author Chin music Oct 2021 #24

Screw due process! AZSkiffyGeek Oct 2021 #21

I'm not at all against due process. But let's get on with the due process. Boydog Oct 2021 #43

No, DON'T screw due process! ShazzieB Oct 2021 #66

"All just one person's opinion mind you." MyOwnPeace Oct 2021 #22

This message was self-deleted by its author Chin music Oct 2021 #23

A wonderful post. Thanks Boydog Oct 2021 #29

This message was self-deleted by its author Chin music Oct 2021 #35

see post # 45 monkeyman1 Oct 2021 #46

I agree. Definitely no time to be timid. Boydog Oct 2021 #13

Makes me feel a bit queasy. triron Oct 2021 #15

Timid and prudent are not synonyms. dchill Oct 2021 #55

Post removed Post removed Oct 2021 #6

J is for Justice. 1-2 decades overdue for some of Trump's actions Tetrachloride Oct 2021 #12

IF Garland refuses (I do not think he will refuse) to enforce, Biden MUST sack him. He has no choice Celerity Oct 2021 #25

Absolutely not FBaggins Oct 2021 #30

B.S. Total B.S. nt Grasswire2 Oct 2021 #31

Sorry, completely disagree. If Garland does refuse, he is blocking the will of the House and Celerity Oct 2021 #39

I totally agree Boydog Oct 2021 #47

I don't understand where all this anxiety wnylib Oct 2021 #48

it goes to the DC US Attorney first, & my original reply stated I do not think Garland will block it Celerity Oct 2021 #68

You're right. it goes to the DC US District Attorney first. wnylib Oct 2021 #77

I am SO tired if people thinking they have somehow read Garland's mind... ShazzieB Oct 2021 #69

Yes, agree. Certainly congress has oversight on Garland and can recommend his firing if LymphocyteLover Oct 2021 #59

not a political enemy , a damn crime !! jeeze ! monkeyman1 Oct 2021 #49

It isn't an either/or scenario FBaggins Oct 2021 #64

agreed ! monkeyman1 Oct 2021 #73

There is a difference between politics and wrong doing that threatens PufPuf23 Oct 2021 #72

This message was self-deleted by its author Chin music Oct 2021 #36

Good point. BigmanPigman Oct 2021 #65

People here used to post similarly vapid criticisms of Holder. tritsofme Oct 2021 #90

These DOJ guys only seem to fear and respect republicans ecstatic Oct 2021 #27

Bill Barr to the rescue. stillcool Oct 2021 #33

There is a legal procedure for this that has been wnylib Oct 2021 #76

I would have liked Eric Holder... Duppers Oct 2021 #28

This message was self-deleted by its author Chin music Oct 2021 #38

Because, as you pointed out, he is a very smart man. Beastly Boy Oct 2021 #32

what a spoil-sport! stillcool Oct 2021 #37

There's still Manchin and Sinema AZSkiffyGeek Oct 2021 #42

yeah...I usually have myself nailed stillcool Oct 2021 #78

I'm with Adam Schiff. Grasswire2 Oct 2021 #44

I am not sure why the House didn't go this way. Beastly Boy Oct 2021 #54

should they find criminally liable ---- gag ! monkeyman1 Oct 2021 #52

It is way beyond any of our pay grade to make this judgement. Beastly Boy Oct 2021 #56

Thank you for this comment. ShazzieB Oct 2021 #75

What authority makes sure the subpoena is honored. Boydog Oct 2021 #53

There is a well defined chain of authorities that leads to the subpoena being honored. Beastly Boy Oct 2021 #58

One minor correction. It is the US Attorney for the District, not the DC Attorney General. onenote Oct 2021 #60

You're right, my bad. Beastly Boy Oct 2021 #63

... NurseJackie Oct 2021 #74

I don't actually know what you are talking about mcar Oct 2021 #79

No, no statement... Ohio Joe Oct 2021 #83

That explains it. Thanks. mcar Oct 2021 #84