Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

WA-03 Democrat

(3,357 posts)
10. This is obvious
Mon Oct 25, 2021, 05:08 PM
Oct 2021

Trump wanted to over throw the government. He's said to the crowd "we are going to walk down there and make the right choice." Over throw the results for Trump not how the people voted. The only thing shocking is we had a President who wanted to over throw the United States. Lock that fucker up.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Kicked and recommended. Uncle Joe Oct 2021 #1
K & R Celerity Oct 2021 #2
This message was self-deleted by its author Celerity Oct 2021 #3
Yes, but they have to have proof, not anonymous sources, that won't be good enough JohnSJ Oct 2021 #4
Rolling Stone has proof/documents. Only keeping sources... brush Oct 2021 #13
This message was self-deleted by its author Chin music Oct 2021 #19
Looks like the people whose guilt was already obvious FoxNewsSucks Oct 2021 #23
I'm surprised after his high fist salute, that Josh Hawley wasn't included in the list. n/t aggiesal Oct 2021 #34
Sadly, only one of those is in the Senate. soldierant Oct 2021 #98
I feel like Dorian Gray Oct 2021 #114
Exactly LoveMyCali Oct 2021 #76
the ... PLANNING ... of J6 attack was illegal, we only need to prove rallies were connected in any uponit7771 Oct 2021 #119
Works for me Hekate Oct 2021 #5
Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes lindysalsagal Oct 2021 #6
While I completely agree they should, we barely got the votes to enforce a subpoena on Bannon berni_mccoy Oct 2021 #7
It wasn't barely. Several republicans voted against Bannon. brush Oct 2021 #14
To expel a member you need 2/3rd majority. berni_mccoy Oct 2021 #48
That's not what my response was to. Several repugs... brush Oct 2021 #50
Several. Would that be a handful? Right. Barely. berni_mccoy Oct 2021 #53
Come on. Nine votes with the Dems is not barely. Two or three is barely. brush Oct 2021 #54
it's 4 percent of the Repulblican House Caucus qazplm135 Oct 2021 #80
Nine is hardly barely when it's usually none. It passed easily. brush Oct 2021 #99
you're the one quibbling qazplm135 Oct 2021 #100
No. You're the johnny come lately to this. See post 7 brush Oct 2021 #101
you mean the thread I read? qazplm135 Oct 2021 #102
You don't seem to get that the OP 7 poster moved the goalpost... brush Oct 2021 #103
yep qazplm135 Oct 2021 #104
Ahhhh...you better look in the mirror. brush Oct 2021 #105
clever qazplm135 Oct 2021 #106
But it's true. We're two of a kind, buddy. brush Oct 2021 #124
Lol qazplm135 Oct 2021 #131
Come on, it happened because we are. Admit. I just did. brush Oct 2021 #133
Nine repugs voted with Dems spanone Oct 2021 #108
My thought as well leftieNanner Oct 2021 #15
Why are you thinking we need Reptilian votes? lagomorph777 Oct 2021 #87
This Is Not Something That Should Go To A Vote Of The Whole House..... global1 Oct 2021 #17
This message was self-deleted by its author Chin music Oct 2021 #20
My hope is that the DOJ prosecutes them and then the House will be forced to expel them berni_mccoy Oct 2021 #49
Why would the house be forced to expel them? Alpeduez21 Oct 2021 #55
I should have used the word pressure berni_mccoy Oct 2021 #57
I agree. TomSlick Oct 2021 #72
Where did you get the 2/3 majority thing? That's not in the Constitution. lagomorph777 Oct 2021 #86
Article 1, Section 2, Clause 2. TomSlick Oct 2021 #130
I believe you are absolutely correct! Evolve Dammit Oct 2021 #65
Only a majority is needed, and after we expel a few, our majority widens. lagomorph777 Oct 2021 #84
The Constitution says 2/3 majority is required to expel. berni_mccoy Oct 2021 #90
No it doesn't! lagomorph777 Oct 2021 #92
Article 1, Section 5, Clause 2 berni_mccoy Oct 2021 #93
This is not (mere) disorderly behavior. It's disqualification for insurrection. lagomorph777 Oct 2021 #96
I'm sorry but you don't know what you're talking about berni_mccoy Oct 2021 #97
MOST DEFINITELY!!! True Dough Oct 2021 #8
KR Bristlecone Oct 2021 #9
This is obvious WA-03 Democrat Oct 2021 #10
Now we need many more democrats to come out the same way. Or will they send a stern worded letter? triron Oct 2021 #11
+1,000 malaise Oct 2021 #12
And when she has 1/3 of House Republicans to vote with the Democrats, I'll be impressed. brooklynite Oct 2021 #16
Is that the standard? maxsolomon Oct 2021 #25
Yes: and you'll need roughly 1/3 of the Republicans to join the Democrats to get to 2/3. brooklynite Oct 2021 #42
Well, shit. It's not happening, and AOC knows it. maxsolomon Oct 2021 #62
The way your previous post reads I think you may be right. hadEnuf Oct 2021 #67
So she shouldn't be calling for it? Cuthbert Allgood Oct 2021 #123
I don't know any more. maxsolomon Oct 2021 #126
Somehow, I am reading this differently. colorado_ufo Oct 2021 #66
I am reading it the same way you are. hadEnuf Oct 2021 #69
You are wrong... brooklynite Oct 2021 #73
Not sure of your point Bob_in_VA Oct 2021 #77
There is no Federal restriction on voting... brooklynite Oct 2021 #78
2/3 needed to let them serve; not to boot them out. lagomorph777 Oct 2021 #91
+1000 That is, indeed what the words say; some here like to get creative though lagomorph777 Oct 2021 #89
Where are you getting that? That's not what it says at all. lagomorph777 Oct 2021 #88
I'll rely on Speaker Pelosi's judgement. brooklynite Oct 2021 #117
I suspect most of the country will be disappointed in the outcome. lagomorph777 Oct 2021 #118
In THAT regard, I suspect the average voter doesn't care... brooklynite Oct 2021 #125
No problem. In a few years, there will be no voters. lagomorph777 Oct 2021 #127
If true, so what? Hold the vote anyway ecstatic Oct 2021 #116
Following your logic, any politicians who argued for women's suffrage or for Celerity Oct 2021 #121
Yeah, but I'm sure in his head it sounded really clever in his head. Then again "Country Club humor" Carlitos Brigante Oct 2021 #132
K&R CentralMass Oct 2021 #18
YES!!! Tom Yossarian Joad Oct 2021 #21
It's way overdue for that to be publicly demanded. FoxNewsSucks Oct 2021 #22
I agree they should be expelled... lees1975 Oct 2021 #24
+1 K&R onetexan Oct 2021 #27
Good point. BigmanPigman Oct 2021 #39
Kick dalton99a Oct 2021 #26
i wanna see any of those traitors who co signed the lawsuit to over turn AllaN01Bear Oct 2021 #28
GREAT strategy to plant facts of the tapes showing tours, docs & testimony showing pre-Jan6 comms. ancianita Oct 2021 #29
Absofreakinglutely! SergeStorms Oct 2021 #30
I agree 100% n/t JesterCS Oct 2021 #31
sick of this damn government afraid they might get bad PR from THE -EX- clusterf#%f! monkeyman1 Oct 2021 #32
Sorry, it will never happen. There will be no consequences for any of this. Wake me if I'm wrong. PSPS Oct 2021 #33
WAKE UP! SergeStorms Oct 2021 #41
Coordinating with a legal rally isn't the same as coordination with the attackers of the Capitol Kaleva Oct 2021 #45
It will keep this at the top of the news cycle. This Jan 6 story is picking up momentum. Midnight Writer Oct 2021 #82
Huge +1 BeckyDem Oct 2021 #35
K&R How do we get behind this? We cannot have insurrectionists in power. ffr Oct 2021 #36
TO A.O.C.---- YOU GO GIRL !! RIDE THIS HORSE ! ALL MUST GO ! monkeyman1 Oct 2021 #37
TRAITORS! Kid Berwyn Oct 2021 #38
I'm with AOC on this one peggysue2 Oct 2021 #40
You bet. They are traitors to the republic. PatrickforB Oct 2021 #43
Has it been determined if any member of Congress cooridnated with those who stormed the Capitol? Kaleva Oct 2021 #44
Thank you AOC. Republican traitors deserve jail. Champp Oct 2021 #46
I totally agree demosurvivor Oct 2021 #47
She's more gracious about this than I Generic Brad Oct 2021 #51
+1 THIS bucolic_frolic Oct 2021 #56
Sure. Why not? NurseJackie Oct 2021 #52
Like someone asked you.... SergeStorms Oct 2021 #63
How about let them face the mob who hates them with no protection Tribetime Oct 2021 #58
It's called removing the cancerous tumor Blue Owl Oct 2021 #59
We were so quick to: BidenRocks Oct 2021 #60
Jodey Arrington is a lap-dog too. czarjak Oct 2021 #61
Yes! Evolve Dammit Oct 2021 #64
Reply # 66 Septua Oct 2021 #68
Violation of Oath Septua Oct 2021 #71
I don't see a Reply #66 RussBLib Oct 2021 #74
It was #66 when I started it... Septua Oct 2021 #83
In my darkest moments, Codifer Oct 2021 #70
you need a 2/3 vote to expel a lawmaker NewJeffCT Oct 2021 #75
Which was my point... Septua Oct 2021 #85
Wrong. lagomorph777 Oct 2021 #94
The power to exclude comes from Article 1, Section 5 of the Constitution. Celerity Oct 2021 #109
Bless her! mahina Oct 2021 #79
This should be a given. It's amazing it would even be up for debate. nt Quixote1818 Oct 2021 #81
Yup. Wingus Dingus Oct 2021 #95
K&R spanone Oct 2021 #107
K&R mvd Oct 2021 #110
K&R ck4829 Oct 2021 #111
The Republicans in the House will support that the day after I hit the Powerball. nt cstanleytech Oct 2021 #112
K&R UCmeNdc Oct 2021 #113
Of course. Ask yourself, what would republicans do? ecstatic Oct 2021 #115
!00% lark Oct 2021 #120
It's a laudable policy. Of course there has to be due process. Bucky Oct 2021 #122
Even if it can't be enforced, the publicity will drive the point home to the people. NH Ethylene Oct 2021 #128
Absolutely catrose Oct 2021 #129
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»AOC Calls for Expulsion o...»Reply #10