Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: OK men - we need to have a heart to heart with...men! 538 blog on the Gender Gap... [View all]lumberjack_jeff
(33,224 posts)79. Okay, let's accept that "misogynist" was some kind of tourettes/non sequitur outburst...
... completely out of context of the post to which he was replying. That he didn't simply summon "misogynist" from the ether without having a preexisting stereotype to which he was reacting.
I think it wasn't. To the poster, "men" and "misogynist" are synonymous and therefore unfit to be democrats.
Thus, my point is proven. QED.
"White" is impossible to ignore in the voting sense. Democrats don't have any problem with minority men identifying with us. The electoral problem is more specific: white men. Even more specifically, working-class white men.
Which segues into a related issue. Each year, white men are less likely to be college educated.
One last thing. If you think I don't support Obama, you're an idiot.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
84 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
OK men - we need to have a heart to heart with...men! 538 blog on the Gender Gap... [View all]
NRaleighLiberal
Oct 2012
OP
i think they are just as afraid as the wimmins will think for themselves, be independent
seabeyond
Oct 2012
#18
I think this is the kind of post you would highly object to, were the genders reversed. nt
Romulox
Oct 2012
#44
i think you would be wrong. i think history proves out my point. centuries of it. nt
seabeyond
Oct 2012
#51
It's the exact kind of statement I suggest shouldnt be made in my #49 below
stevenleser
Oct 2012
#68
Ah, but isn't it refreshing that the DU men are smarter and open-minded?
Frustratedlady
Oct 2012
#10
I love how you say "they" about 10 times here--without ever defining who exactly you are speaking!
Romulox
Oct 2012
#41
Okay, let's accept that "misogynist" was some kind of tourettes/non sequitur outburst...
lumberjack_jeff
Oct 2012
#79
That's not much of a clarification. You revert back to "them" and "they" by your second paragraph.
Romulox
Oct 2012
#84
I would be interested to see the breakdwn by geography, or, say, religion.
Warren DeMontague
Oct 2012
#14
A lot of VERY angry posts to this thread. Not sure some of them are about politics, really. nt
Romulox
Oct 2012
#43
The question is "How to further rights for women and minorities without alienating the majority."
stevenleser
Oct 2012
#49
It's not really a macho thing, because most Hispanic and Black men vote Dem.
reformist2
Oct 2012
#63
Are they calling young men? Our students? Are cell phone users included in polls?
SaveAmerica
Oct 2012
#75
I wish! We picked our last tomatoes the first week of August. disease/weather got them!
NRaleighLiberal
Oct 2012
#76