Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

CoffeeCat

(24,411 posts)
30. One thing is clear...
Mon Oct 22, 2012, 03:55 PM
Oct 2012

In September, King was calling for Rice to resign. He asserted that she was lying and covering up.

Now, it appears (from the video you posted) that his argument is now that the tape MAY be the reason for the protest---but so also could terrorism.

That seems to be the big distinction--which is definitely a walk back.

This is King's way of saying, "Yeah, yeah--both assertions may be correct (1. The tape played a part in the demonstrations; 2.) The attack was spontaneous, but grew out of the tape demonstration) but Obama tried to hide that this was a terrorist attack."

I think that King knows (as chairman of the Homeland Security Committee) that this is what the intelligence shows.

I think the Republicans know that they are screwed with nowhere to go--because Obama did call this "an act of terror" on at least two occasions. Plus, it looks like the intelligence will also show that Al Queda (but other militants/terrorists in Libya) committed this act.

So, basically--all of the Republican conspiracy theories just completely fell apart.

I have to say---I really hope that the Democrats and Obama don't just "move on" from this. The Republicans will want to "move on" because they can't fire-breath and fearmonger on this issue any longer. However, we should hold them accountable and point out their ridiculous conspiracy-mongering. They called the President a liar and accused him of covering up an Al Queda attack!

I think we need to drive that home! The Republicans were reckless, immature and amateurish for an entire month on this. This speaks to Romney's lack of foreign-policy skills and his very unpresidential behavior.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Google: house republicans cut funding for embassy security L0oniX Oct 2012 #1
Right--I got that, but this sounds like even newer information... CoffeeCat Oct 2012 #5
I don't understand why this isn't the FIRST response... Whiskeytide Oct 2012 #21
RepubliBuggers cut the security budget and left the embassies VULNERABLE Berlum Oct 2012 #23
...and then blame Obama. L0oniX Oct 2012 #35
That is complete nonsense. His trip was planned weeks earlier, and his itinerary was released leveymg Oct 2012 #2
Thank you for this... CoffeeCat Oct 2012 #7
I'm not sure about that.... OldDem2012 Oct 2012 #8
A copy of the exact itinerary was posted by the WaPo leveymg Oct 2012 #29
If true, this revelation will serve Obama in good stead tonight. WinkyDink Oct 2012 #3
If true, it is a full-blown nuclear meltdown for the Romney campaign... CoffeeCat Oct 2012 #11
And all the while Proud Liberal Dem Oct 2012 #25
Yes, and "investigation" CoffeeCat Oct 2012 #27
Didn't hear it, I do think it's very interesting, and I am stunned... OldDem2012 Oct 2012 #4
Some more speculation here. mainer Oct 2012 #6
Actually, there's no question that the Ambassador was dealing personally with Libyan militia groups, leveymg Oct 2012 #9
Everyone needs to read your link! Thank you for posting!! CoffeeCat Oct 2012 #10
There is a fine line between Dept of State and CIA - many CIA are under diplomatic cover, but it leveymg Oct 2012 #12
I agree that it's unlikely a full Ambassador is CIA ... mainer Oct 2012 #13
The locals knew he was in town because they met with him at 4pm the day before. leveymg Oct 2012 #15
Right...Stevens may not have been CIA... CoffeeCat Oct 2012 #16
Romney's sniping has been badly aimed from the beginning. I think he's disinformed leveymg Oct 2012 #19
A must read post. ProudProgressiveNow Oct 2012 #18
I'm always reminded of my first experience with Geraldo Savannahmann Oct 2012 #14
It seems related to Steven's journal... CoffeeCat Oct 2012 #17
Reserving judgement for now but a lot of information here to mull over. Thanks for posting K&R nt riderinthestorm Oct 2012 #20
Stevens's journal .... not a peep from CNN, who found it. mainer Oct 2012 #22
Look at how (R) Rep Peter King has changed his tune on Benghazi CoffeeCat Oct 2012 #24
Here is King on Andrea Greenspan's MSNBC show today: ChisolmTrailDem Oct 2012 #28
One thing is clear... CoffeeCat Oct 2012 #30
Wow. Even Fox News is admitting it was an attack on the CIA mainer Oct 2012 #26
And this is what pisses me off more than anything! CoffeeCat Oct 2012 #33
The two videos attached to the article on the Faux site PufPuf23 Oct 2012 #34
The only Reason there is any Issue was because Romney made up Shit and the Whore JI7 Oct 2012 #31
And if it was CIA and Issa releasing those Libyian cables with names justiceischeap Oct 2012 #32
Did you all notice Benghazi was scarcely mentioned at the debate? mainer Oct 2012 #36
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Something stunning that I...»Reply #30