Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

CoffeeCat

(24,411 posts)
33. And this is what pisses me off more than anything!
Mon Oct 22, 2012, 03:05 PM
Oct 2012

You are exactly right.

In their rabid effort to dig and dig--and find something on which to trip Obama--they unearthed the fact that they were wrong, impulsive, reckless and that Obama was not the villain that they painted him to be.

In fact, quite the opposite is true.

I watched a lot of Fox News during the Benghazi unfolding. I watched hours of Sean Hannity, O' Reilly and the rest of the peanut gallery accusing President Obama of covering up an Al Queda attack and saying that he did it for political gain.

The political implications of this are enormous!

Right-wing radio spent weeks on this. They repeatedly said that Obama "wasn't being straight with the American people" and painted Obama as an opportunist who would lie to the American people about Benghazi in order to increase his poll numbers.

It's just revolting! These people affected the Presidential polls! The Republicans used this issue to suggest that Obama was lazy, and unwilling to get to the bottom of Benghazi because he just didn't have the will or the energy to do it. They claimed--The Middle East was on fire, Syria is a battlefield---and it is because of Obama's failures--and they used Benghazi to suggest that Obama's cover up is symptomatic of other foreign-policy failures.

So now, we find out that the underlying suppositions of their arguments were nothing but PURE BALDERDASH!

It's just so SICK that these political vampires are allowed to rum rampant in destructive toddler mode--and then when the truth is unearthed, do they really get to say, "Oh never mind..." and just slink away???

They'll be on to the next destructive rumor and conspiracy theory in a few hours I bet!

We need to use this situation to demonstrate how unfit for command Romney is (after all, he touted their nonsense)!

Unbelievable, if the Republicans and Romney get a free pass after they spent a month spewing LIES!

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Google: house republicans cut funding for embassy security L0oniX Oct 2012 #1
Right--I got that, but this sounds like even newer information... CoffeeCat Oct 2012 #5
I don't understand why this isn't the FIRST response... Whiskeytide Oct 2012 #21
RepubliBuggers cut the security budget and left the embassies VULNERABLE Berlum Oct 2012 #23
...and then blame Obama. L0oniX Oct 2012 #35
That is complete nonsense. His trip was planned weeks earlier, and his itinerary was released leveymg Oct 2012 #2
Thank you for this... CoffeeCat Oct 2012 #7
I'm not sure about that.... OldDem2012 Oct 2012 #8
A copy of the exact itinerary was posted by the WaPo leveymg Oct 2012 #29
If true, this revelation will serve Obama in good stead tonight. WinkyDink Oct 2012 #3
If true, it is a full-blown nuclear meltdown for the Romney campaign... CoffeeCat Oct 2012 #11
And all the while Proud Liberal Dem Oct 2012 #25
Yes, and "investigation" CoffeeCat Oct 2012 #27
Didn't hear it, I do think it's very interesting, and I am stunned... OldDem2012 Oct 2012 #4
Some more speculation here. mainer Oct 2012 #6
Actually, there's no question that the Ambassador was dealing personally with Libyan militia groups, leveymg Oct 2012 #9
Everyone needs to read your link! Thank you for posting!! CoffeeCat Oct 2012 #10
There is a fine line between Dept of State and CIA - many CIA are under diplomatic cover, but it leveymg Oct 2012 #12
I agree that it's unlikely a full Ambassador is CIA ... mainer Oct 2012 #13
The locals knew he was in town because they met with him at 4pm the day before. leveymg Oct 2012 #15
Right...Stevens may not have been CIA... CoffeeCat Oct 2012 #16
Romney's sniping has been badly aimed from the beginning. I think he's disinformed leveymg Oct 2012 #19
A must read post. ProudProgressiveNow Oct 2012 #18
I'm always reminded of my first experience with Geraldo Savannahmann Oct 2012 #14
It seems related to Steven's journal... CoffeeCat Oct 2012 #17
Reserving judgement for now but a lot of information here to mull over. Thanks for posting K&R nt riderinthestorm Oct 2012 #20
Stevens's journal .... not a peep from CNN, who found it. mainer Oct 2012 #22
Look at how (R) Rep Peter King has changed his tune on Benghazi CoffeeCat Oct 2012 #24
Here is King on Andrea Greenspan's MSNBC show today: ChisolmTrailDem Oct 2012 #28
One thing is clear... CoffeeCat Oct 2012 #30
Wow. Even Fox News is admitting it was an attack on the CIA mainer Oct 2012 #26
And this is what pisses me off more than anything! CoffeeCat Oct 2012 #33
The two videos attached to the article on the Faux site PufPuf23 Oct 2012 #34
The only Reason there is any Issue was because Romney made up Shit and the Whore JI7 Oct 2012 #31
And if it was CIA and Issa releasing those Libyian cables with names justiceischeap Oct 2012 #32
Did you all notice Benghazi was scarcely mentioned at the debate? mainer Oct 2012 #36
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Something stunning that I...»Reply #33