Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Steve Bannon [View all]Silent3
(15,909 posts)20. Whichever ones are in the way
We've gone too far already in making the executive branch too powerful in relation to the legislative. It's about time to turn back some of this excessive protection of Presidents.
And why should the judicial branch give a damn what internal procedures were followed by the DoJ? Their job is to look at the merits of the case itself the DoJ brings to court, not the process that produces the case (unless the process was so out of bounds it tainted evidence or intimidated witnesses or the like).
If some judges do care for some reason, let it piss them off. I'm more concerned about saving our Democracy, not someone else excessive fondness for protocol.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
42 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
And Garland does nothing. I hate to say this but I am leaning toward wanting Garland's removal
Boydog
Nov 2021
#7
And yet there are a lot of legal experts who are also wondering why it's taking Garland so long
Poiuyt
Nov 2021
#10
Actually OLC memos are binding *unless overturned by the Attorney General or President*
Silent3
Nov 2021
#17
Do you propose that Garland overturn all of them? Some of them? One of them?
Beastly Boy
Nov 2021
#19
If your objection is this general, what does it have to do with Garland at all?
Beastly Boy
Nov 2021
#28
I simply don't concur that all DoJ and OLC policy is and always has been to protect democracy
Silent3
Nov 2021
#35
Oh yeah, Meadows would have folded if only Garland stopped his investigation midstream!
Beastly Boy
Nov 2021
#36